On 06/06/2017 02:32 AM, Didik Setiawan wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 02:37:54 +0700 Tim Rühsen wrote:
>> I guess Christian meant to skip the appropriate tests if MHD is not
>> installed/
>> available. We should definitely get rid of our server code in libwget and
>> focus on client functionality
On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 02:37:54 +0700 Tim Rühsen wrote:
> I guess Christian meant to skip the appropriate tests if MHD is not
> installed/
> available. We should definitely get rid of our server code in libwget and
> focus on client functionality. Kick it out once MHD code works :-)
Understood.
Hi Didik,
thanks for the summary of week #1 !
On Dienstag, 6. Juni 2017 00:40:56 CEST Didik Setiawan wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 23:51:00 +0700 Christian Grothoff
wrote:
> > Maybe I missed something, but why should the MHD dependency become
> > _mandatory_? Why not conditionally-compile and ru
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 23:51:00 +0700 Christian Grothoff wrote:
> Maybe I missed something, but why should the MHD dependency become
> _mandatory_? Why not conditionally-compile and run the tests only if MHD
> is present?
Maybe I just misinterpreting this [1]? What Darshit said about removing old
Maybe I missed something, but why should the MHD dependency become
_mandatory_? Why not conditionally-compile and run the tests only if MHD
is present? MHD does the same for libcurl. Making the dependency
optional also avoids the obvious possibility of circular dependencies if
we ever were to add
= SUMMARY ==
My public fork of Wget2 project is available here [1]. I will continuously keep
pushing my work so anyone interested can track me there. Feel free to
participate in the discussions going on merge request with my mentor
