[Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-05-21 Thread Ray Satiro
src/ChangeLog src/http.c src/url.c @ src/http.c: - (create_authorization_line) Fix syntax error in calls to NTLM functions. @ src/url.c: - (url_file_name) Use MAX_PATH in Windows. --- src/ChangeLog | 6 ++ src/http.c| 12 +--- src/url.c | 19 +++ 3 files ch

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-05-21 Thread Giuseppe Scrivano
Ray Satiro writes: > +2013-05-21 Ray Satiro > + > + * http.c (create_authorization_line): Fix syntax error in calls to NTLM > + functions. > + * url.c (url_file_name): Use MAX_PATH in Windows. > + wonderful! I am going to push it after I tweak the commit message a bit. Thanks ag

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-06-14 Thread Tim Ruehsen
What about Rays patch ? I just did a 'git pull', but still can't see it ... Am Wednesday 22 May 2013 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano: > Ray Satiro writes: > > +2013-05-21 Ray Satiro > > + > > + * http.c (create_authorization_line): Fix syntax error in calls to NTLM > > + functions. > > + * ur

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-06-14 Thread Darshit Shah
> What about Rays patch ? > I just did a 'git pull', but still can't see it ... > It is pushed in the wget-parallel branch. Switch to it and pull. Maybe this patch should be merged to origin/master? -- Thanking You, Darshit Shah

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-06-14 Thread Tim Ruehsen
Am Friday 14 June 2013 schrieb Darshit Shah: > > What about Rays patch ? > > I just did a 'git pull', but still can't see it ... > > It is pushed in the wget-parallel branch. > Switch to it and pull. > > Maybe this patch should be merged to origin/master? I just switched to branch 'parallel-wget

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-06-16 Thread Giuseppe Scrivano
Tim Ruehsen writes: > Am Friday 14 June 2013 schrieb Darshit Shah: >> > What about Rays patch ? >> > I just did a 'git pull', but still can't see it ... >> >> It is pushed in the wget-parallel branch. >> Switch to it and pull. >> >> Maybe this patch should be merged to origin/master? > > I just

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-06-16 Thread Giuseppe Scrivano
Giuseppe Scrivano writes: >> In my understanding, all new general patches should go into 'master', those >> regarding metalink/multithreading should go into (experimental) 'parallel- >> wget' for later merging with 'master'. > > obviously it has to be into master too, thanks to have reported it.

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-06-16 Thread Tim Rühsen
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano: > Giuseppe Scrivano writes: > > >> In my understanding, all new general patches should go into 'master', those > >> regarding metalink/multithreading should go into (experimental) 'parallel- > >> wget' for later merging with 'master'. > > >

Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] MinGW compatibility fixes

2013-06-16 Thread Giuseppe Scrivano
Tim Rühsen writes: > Some people stumbled upon the _PC_NAME_MAX stuff when compiling for Windows. > Just search the last 2 months for '_PC_NAME_MAX'. Thanks. I have cherry-picked this part of the change into master, I have pushed this patch, it is a subset of the patch that was originally sent