Hi Martin,
having an abort() without a message is simply a big waste of time for any
developer who stumbles upon it.
Since the init code of Wget has to be rewritten anyways, i provide the fastest
solution right now: increasing the buffer size and printing a message before
Wget aborts.
And yes
Tim Rühsen writes:
> having an abort() without a message is simply a big waste of time for any
> developer who stumbles upon it.
I disagree here, what is so difficult that a debugger cannot catch? On
the other hand, I agree this can be improved.
> Since the init code of Wget has to be rewri
Am Sonntag, 12. Mai 2013 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano:
> Tim Rühsen writes:
>
> > having an abort() without a message is simply a big waste of time for any
> > developer who stumbles upon it.
>
> I disagree here, what is so difficult that a debugger cannot catch? On
> the other hand, I agree this
On 12/05/13 21:50, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> A real solution would be a rewrite of the init stuff (I saw that already
> somewhere on the Wget 2.0 wish list or somewhere - don't remeber exactly).
>
> I already wrote this kind of code and would contribute it to Wget.
> But i am unshure how to apply it to
Am Sonntag, 12. Mai 2013 schrieb Ángel González:
> On 12/05/13 21:50, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> > A real solution would be a rewrite of the init stuff (I saw that already
> > somewhere on the Wget 2.0 wish list or somewhere - don't remeber exactly).
> >
> > I already wrote this kind of code and would co
Greetings, Tim Rühsen.
Possible that i'm understood wrong, but according to
http://www.mingw.org/wiki/C99 MinGW doesn't support C99 at all. So i'm not
sure about cross-compile.
May be after implementation of C99 code it can be compiled only through
CygWin (don't remember exactly, but two years ago
Hi Alex,
yes, it is the _PC_NAME_MAX issue which is only valid for pathconf().
Attached is the little patch to fix it.
Since MinGW is based on gcc-4.6, C99 should be available.
As the Wiki states (well, the entry is 3 years old...), printf() is the main
issue. But there may be some other functi
Greetings, Tim Rühsen
About C99 - sorry, i think "If article isn't changed/removed then it's
still actually". Yes, in MinGW mailing lists i find mention about
"-std=c99" and "changes to mingw_snprintf". Sorry for mistake.
May be it's time for new test branch - "wget-C99"? And then find what
fragm
Hi Alex,
snprintf %a seems to print the correct result with wine (set to WinXP), but
the same executable on a real WinXP just prints 'a'.
Replacing the sprintf() by __mingw_sprintf printed the correct result with
wine and on the WinXP machine.
> About C99 - sorry, i think "If article isn't cha
Tim Rühsen writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
> yes, it is the _PC_NAME_MAX issue which is only valid for pathconf().
>
> Attached is the little patch to fix it.
>
> Since MinGW is based on gcc-4.6, C99 should be available.
> As the Wiki states (well, the entry is 3 years old...), printf() is the main
> issue
Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano:
> Tim Rühsen writes:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > yes, it is the _PC_NAME_MAX issue which is only valid for pathconf().
> >
> > Attached is the little patch to fix it.
> >
> > Since MinGW is based on gcc-4.6, C99 should be available.
> > As the Wik
11 matches
Mail list logo
