files with specific extensions
(2011?12?22? 08:39), Vikram Narayanan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Tony Lewis wrote:
>> Vikram Narayanan wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't it a waste of bandwidth?
>>> Is it not possible to check only the PDF files without downlo
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Micah Cowan wrote:
> (2011年12月22日 08:39), Vikram Narayanan wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Tony Lewis wrote:
>>> Vikram Narayanan wrote:
>>>
Isn't it a waste of bandwidth?
Is it not possible to check only the PDF files without downloading the
(2011年12月22日 08:39), Vikram Narayanan wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Tony Lewis wrote:
>> Vikram Narayanan wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't it a waste of bandwidth?
>>> Is it not possible to check only the PDF files without downloading the
>> whole content?
>>
>> wget has to download HTML content in
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Tony Lewis wrote:
> Vikram Narayanan wrote:
>
>> Isn't it a waste of bandwidth?
>> Is it not possible to check only the PDF files without downloading the
> whole content?
>
> wget has to download HTML content in order to discover where the PDF files
> are located,
Vikram Narayanan wrote:
> Isn't it a waste of bandwidth?
> Is it not possible to check only the PDF files without downloading the
whole content?
wget has to download HTML content in order to discover where the PDF files
are located,
Just joined the list.
If I give a command, say
wget -r -A.pdf http://www.example.com
(My wish is to download all the files that has extension PDF)
Why does wget download all the files and reject the others except pdf's.
Isn't it a waste of bandwidth?
Is it not possible to check only the PDF files
