Am Donnerstag, 20. November 2014, 17:22:24 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
> Hi,
>
> > Am 20.11.2014 um 08:55 schrieb Ángel González :
> >
> > On 20/11/14 07:34, Darshit Shah wrote:
> >> And talking about legalities, I'm hoping you already have signed the
> >> assignment papers because otherwise that
Hi,
> Am 20.11.2014 um 08:55 schrieb Ángel González :
>
> On 20/11/14 07:34, Darshit Shah wrote:
>> And talking about legalities, I'm hoping you already have signed the
>> assignment papers because otherwise that's even more work, before we can add
>> this to the source. :-)
> Come on, that's n
On 20/11/14 07:34, Darshit Shah wrote:
And talking about legalities, I'm hoping you already have signed the
assignment papers because otherwise that's even more work, before we
can add this to the source. :-)
Come on, that's not needed for trivial changes :)
The given shell script is a perfect
+01:00 Pär Karlsson :
>>
>> Or, if there's any real need, may I suggest this simple patch for making
>>> a
>>> wrapper in contrib/wcat? :-9
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> /Pär
>>>
>>> 2014-11-19 22:34 GMT+01:00 W
11-19 22:34 GMT+01:00 William Tracy :
I meant to send this to the whole list, sorry.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "William Tracy"
Date: Nov 19, 2014 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?
To: "Dagobert Michelsen"
Cc:
Two thoughts:
1. Curl already behaves t
I think Alfred wants to have a behaviour similar to to gzip/gzcat
where you could also have similar structure but nonetheless gzip
ships gzcat, gzgrep etc.
Exactly.
in contrib/wcat? :-9
>
> Best regards,
>
> /Pär
>
> 2014-11-19 22:34 GMT+01:00 William Tracy :
>
>> I meant to send this to the whole list, sorry.
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: "William Tracy"
>> Date: Nov 19, 2014 1:32 PM
&
Tracy"
> Date: Nov 19, 2014 1:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?
> To: "Dagobert Michelsen"
> Cc:
>
> Two thoughts:
>
> 1. Curl already behaves this way out of the box, so the path of least
> resistance here would be to just use curl. Curl lacks wget&#
I meant to send this to the whole list, sorry.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "William Tracy"
Date: Nov 19, 2014 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] wcat?
To: "Dagobert Michelsen"
Cc:
Two thoughts:
1. Curl already behaves this way out of the box, so the path of l
Hi Tim,
> Am 17.11.2014 um 20:49 schrieb Tim Rühsen :
>
> Am Montag, 17. November 2014, 09:05:52 schrieb Alfred M. Szmidt:
>> It would be nice if wget also installed a wcat command which would
>> default to something like,
>>
>> wget -o /dev/null -O - "$@"
>>
>> Would it be possible to add som
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> wget -o /dev/null -O - "$@"
By the way, you can accomplish the same thing by:
wget -q -O - "$@"
The point is to have wcat as part of wget, and not require every user
of wget to modify their init files. Aliases also do not work as part
of shell scripts.
Am Montag, 17. November 2014, 09:05:52 schrieb Alfred M. Szmidt:
> It would be nice if wget also installed a wcat command which would
> default to something like,
>
> wget -o /dev/null -O - "$@"
>
> Would it be possible to add something like that?
Something like
$ alias wcat='wget -o /dev/nul
It would be nice if wget also installed a wcat command which would
default to something like,
wget -o /dev/null -O - "$@"
Would it be possible to add something like that?
14 matches
Mail list logo
