Re: [Bug-wget] Thoughts on regex support

2009-09-25 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Lewis wrote: > Micah Cowan wrote: > >> Tony Lewis wrote: > >> "hash" doesn't apply to URIs that wget would handle (it's called the >> "fragment" portion in relevant RFCs), as that's not normally part of >> what gets sent to the server. > But it

RE: [Bug-wget] Thoughts on regex support

2009-09-24 Thread Tony Lewis
Micah Cowan wrote: >Tony Lewis wrote: >"hash" doesn't apply to URIs that wget would handle (it's called the >"fragment" portion in relevant RFCs), as that's not normally part of >what gets sent to the server. But it can appear in the links within a page. Are you going to discard the fragment port

Re: [Bug-wget] Thoughts on regex support

2009-09-24 Thread Micah Cowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Lewis wrote: > Micah Cowan wrote: > >> - It should use extended regular expressions > Agreed > >> PCREs are less important > I have a very strong preference for \s over [[:space]] Meh; looks like gnulib's EREs do that anyway. >> - It should be

RE: [Bug-wget] Thoughts on regex support

2009-09-24 Thread Tony Lewis
Micah Cowan wrote: > - It should use extended regular expressions Agreed > PCREs are less important I have a very strong preference for \s over [[:space]] > - It should be possible to match against just certain components of an > URL Agreed. In your exchange with Matthew some possible labels w