[Bug-XBoard] [bug #36228] reserved identifier violation

2012-04-17 Thread Markus Elfring
URL: Summary: reserved identifier violation Project: XBoard Submitted by: elfring Submitted on: Di 17 Apr 2012 20:30:16 CEST Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal

[Bug-XBoard] [bug #36228] reserved identifier violation

2012-04-17 Thread Markus Elfring
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #36228 (project xboard): There are more update candidates like "_ListGame " and "_OPT" besides the include guards

[Bug-XBoard] [bug #36228] reserved identifier violation

2012-05-28 Thread Arun Persaud
Update of bug #36228 (project xboard): Status:None => Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #2: Changed this in master: renamed _ to XB_. I also made the include guards names more consistent, e

[Bug-XBoard] [bug #36228] reserved identifier violation

2012-06-02 Thread Markus Elfring
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #36228 (project xboard): Thanks for your source code adjustments. I hope that a tool like "Coccinelle " will become able to perform a corresponding semantic grep to find such update candidates.

[Bug-XBoard] [bug #36228] reserved identifier violation

2012-09-29 Thread Arun Persaud
Update of bug #36228 (project xboard): Status: Ready For Test => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

Re: [Bug-XBoard] [bug #36228] reserved identifier violation

2012-04-17 Thread h . g . muller
Are these things even needed? They seem to guard against multiple inclusion of the same header into the same file. But I don't think we do that in the first place. Our .c files #include .h files, and the .h files don't #include anything. Things only get messy when you have .h files include other .h