https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55962
--- Comment #4 from Mike Rumph ---
Backported to 2.4.19 in r1730684.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58985
Jim Jagielski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598
Mike Rumph changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|mod_write unable to proxy |mod_rewrite unable to proxy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598
--- Comment #5 from Alexey ---
(In reply to Chris Harris from comment #4)
> Not sure what the process for backport to 2.2 is, but it seem unlikely I
> think.
Ok, thank you,
Just wonder, will this broke current mod_rewrite in any case?
cas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55315
--- Comment #6 from Alexey ---
Hi, so that is not working in httpd-2.2.15-47.el6.centos.3.x86_64 as well.
With that being said
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml?r1=1532825&r2=1532824&pathrev=1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598
--- Comment #4 from Chris Harris ---
Not sure what the process for backport to 2.2 is, but it seem unlikely I think.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55598
--- Comment #3 from Alexey ---
Hey there, is it realistic to expect backport on 2.2
httpd-2.2.15-47.el6.centos.3.x86_64
I have tested your patch and it works perfectly. Thank you very much.
I just wonder if custom or official mod_rewrite.so c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53579
Mahudeeswaran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mahud...@gmail.com
--
You are receivi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53579
--- Comment #10 from Mahudeeswaran ---
Able to see the issue in 2.2.31 as well, Did any one manage to find any
workaround to overcome this issue or any resolution on this. Is there any
concrete repro steps that would lead to this issue always.