https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65956
--- Comment #2 from mkp...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Christophe JAILLET from comment #1) > Hi, > > I'm not a regex expert, but should: > ([0-9+]) > be > ([0-9]+) > > ? Well that's awkward. You are completely correct and the corrected regex seems to fix *my* problem. I'd happily mark this INVALID and hide my embarrassment, but I think I may have reported a real bug. With the regex I used (and figuring it's best I don't rely on my eyes this time): > $ perl -le '"Firefox/40" =~ m#Firefox/([0-9+])#; print "$1 -lt 31 = ", $1 < > 31 ? "yes" : "no"' > 4 -lt 31 = yes So I was wrong in #0 that: > Somehow it thinks 40 is less than 31? That should read instead: > Somehow it thinks 4 is not less than 31? Please tell me I'm missing something here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org
