https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #2 from Pete ---
This bug is still present in 2.4.16 where I have encountered it today.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #3 from HelgeKrausen ---
Example: Show 198. from 198.19.81.98
Found
You *must* use Backreferences in same Expression!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
Helge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helgekrau...@outlook.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
m...@danil.mobi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@danil.mobi
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
Ingmar Eveslage changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evesl...@gmail.com
--
You are recei
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #4 from Ingmar Eveslage ---
(In reply to Helge from comment #3)
> Example: Show 198. from 198.19.81.98
>
>
> Found
>
> You *must* use Backreferences in same Expression!
That's correct, in the same expression you can use $1 and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #5 from Helge ---
(In reply to Ingmar Eveslage from comment #4)
> (In reply to Helge from comment #3)
> That's correct, in the same expression you can use $1 and backreference
> matches. BUT $0 references always the whole string and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #6 from Ingmar Eveslage ---
i boiled it down a litte:
at first: there has to be an indirection with "
OUTPUT: 1_
changing the second regex in the if statement to $2
OUTPUT: 2_3_4
so the simple "$n =~ /(.*)/" acts like
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #7 from Helge ---
And why does my RegExample correctly working on my server?
(Last Test on Apache/2.4.12: Fri 2016-02-26 10:50 GMT)
---
SSILegacyExprParser Off
---
You CAN use for echoing
#
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #8 from Ingmar Eveslage ---
Thanks for the explanation of the echo part. works.
your example works for me, too. And it does the same as my example. Match a
group and match it again in the same expression. so it gets exported as $0
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #9 from Helge ---
(In reply to Ingmar Eveslage from comment #8)
> Thanks for the explanation of the echo part. works.
I tell you a secret:
I'm personally using 'SSILegacyExprParser On'.
For me and until now It always works. ;-)
G
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #10 from Ingmar Eveslage ---
good to know. but what are the plans for "SSILegacyExprParser". will it be
removed in future versions?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #11 from Helge ---
(In reply to Ingmar Eveslage from comment #10)
> good to know. but what are the plans for "SSILegacyExprParser". will it be
> removed in future versions?
I think, it could be removed in Apache/2.5 (?)
--
You ar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
apa...@jamesahart.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.4.10 |2.4.7
--- Comment #12 from apa..
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
Richard Birkett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.4.7 |2.4-HEAD
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
m...@danil.mobi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|m...@danil.mobi |
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
Sam Liddicott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |regression
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57448
--- Comment #1 from a...@rcpt.at ---
I can reproduce this bug. does work, it
contains the whole string, but $1 does fail exactly as described earlier.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
18 matches
Mail list logo
