https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66424
--- Comment #1 from Christophe JAILLET ---
Hi,
with the numbers given, it looks like something interesting to look at.
If you want to share some code and start a discussion about it, the best would
be to do it via dedicated branch on github
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #19 from Yann Ylavic ---
New note added to
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_proxy.html#protoupgrade (hth..).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #20 from Mina Galić ---
it works.
thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66446
Bug ID: 66446
Summary: ดู!-เชือกป่าน ตอน Ep.12 ย้อนหลัง ฟรี(FINALE)
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66446
ดู!-เชือกป่าน ตอน Ep.12 ย้อนหลัง ฟรี(FINALE)
changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66446
ดู!-เชือกป่าน ตอน Ep.12 ย้อนหลัง ฟรี(FINALE)
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||APIBug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66445
【TW电影】未经审查-流浪地球2-完整版-(2023) 在线观看和 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kmrfdpwl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #21 from Mina Galić ---
one more question: could it be that the mod_rewrite workaround will work on
2.4.47+ without mod_proxy_wstunnel loaded, too?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66453
Bug ID: 66453
Summary: ++ดูหนัง avatar 2 - เต็มเรื่อง 2022 (อวตาร 2) HD พากย์ไทย
THAI
Product: Apache httpd-test
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #22 from Yann Ylavic ---
I think it does work because the workaround sets the ws(s) scheme for
mod_proxy, which mod_proxy_http 2.4.47+ treats as/like "upgrade=websocket" (for
compatibility precisely).
--
You are rece
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #23 from Yann Ylavic ---
I mean with mod_proxy_http 2.4.47+ (and without mod_proxy_wstunnel), both:
ProxyPass "/" "http://example.com/some/ws/capable/path/"; upgrade=websocket
and:
ProxyPass "/"
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #24 from Yann Ylavic ---
Messed up examples:
> ProxyPass "/" "http://example.com/some/ws/capable/path/"; upgrade=websocket
> and:
> ProxyPass "/" "ws://example.com//"
should rea
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66454
Bug ID: 66454
Summary: [lbmethod_heartbeat:notice] [pid 269178:tid
140154442576512] AH02282: No slotmem from
mod_heartmonitor
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66454
--- Comment #1 from Robert Dinse ---
Created attachment 38490
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38490&action=edit
This is my configuration file for building Apache
This is built on Ubuntu 22.04 with gcc 11.3.0.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #25 from Mina Galić ---
i think we can close this bug then.?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66456
Bug ID: 66456
Summary: Directory Traversal Vulnerability
Product: Apache httpd-test
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66456
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66463
Bug ID: 66463
Summary: Socket Stuck on: proxy_fcgi:error (104)Connection
reset by peer:
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.55
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66463
--- Comment #1 from l...@efficientip.com ---
You can also see the issues using a simple curl on the sse.php
curl -k --http2 https://URL/sse.php
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66424
--- Comment #2 from Martin Ma ---
Thanks Christophe, I had send the request and prototype code to dev mail list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465
Bug ID: 66465
Summary: SIGBUS crashes
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465
Joe Orton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Joe Orton
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65180
--- Comment #8 from Marc Stern ---
I have version 2.4.37 (Redhat default) used as a reverse proxy and I can
systematically reproduce the problem with the web sockets, although the effects
are slightly different (but I have additional info
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
Marc Stern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.st...@approach.be
--- Comment #1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417
--- Comment #1 from Marc Stern ---
I think it's a duplicate of
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65180
I added some info in that ticket as it contains more detailed debugging info.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Pluem ---
mod_proxy_wstunnel is deprecated. mod_proxy_http should be used instead. Just
configure a long timeout value for the particular worker in this case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60948
--- Comment #7 from Aaron Ogburn ---
If you need a different timeout for the hcheck (shorter) and the proxied
requests (longer), I saw that could be achieved by setting a short ProxyTimeout
for the hcheck and set a longer desired timeout flag
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65737
--- Comment #3 from Andrii Ustymenko ---
Hi all,
Have the same issue in 2.4.55. Apparently the code mentioned earlier
:~$ vim mod_proxy_balancer.c
[...]
/* Ignore parameters if this looks like XSRF */
ref = apr_table_get(r
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40102
--- Comment #12 from Michael Orlitzky ---
Hi, this is still a problem 15 years later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40102
Michael Orlitzky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mich...@orlitzky.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64433
stephen-spamassas...@digitalnexus.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||step
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
Bug ID: 66480
Summary: AuthBasicFake does not seem to work with e.g.
AuthUserFile/Require
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
--- Comment #1 from Eric Covener ---
I tried to add a contrast between the two directives here from what I could see
in the code/comments
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1907762
In trunk only, SSLUserName impacts
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Anton Mitterer ---
Hey Eric.
Thanks for the clarifying commits. I would have perhaps added some concrete
example directives to point out which are meant, but I guess it's also enough
like that.
I assume
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Anton Mitterer ---
Thinking a bit more about it,... maybe the documentation should actually tell a
bit more, namely with which options AuthBasicFake can actually be combined.
I assume e.g. AuthName makes no sense
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66481
Bug ID: 66481
Summary: SSL_CLIENT_SAN_Email (without _n) doesn't work
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
Bug ID: 66483
Summary: Garbled characters when accessing SSI via HTTP/2 with
RewriteRule
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.55
Hardware: Other
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Eissing ---
I added a test for this at
<https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/blob/master/test/modules/http2/test_007_ssi.py>
and there it behaves as it should. No garbling.
Could you specify the config around t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
--- Comment #2 from kanai3id ---
Created attachment 38501
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38501&action=edit
Error log with LogLevel of http2:trace2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
--- Comment #3 from kanai3id ---
Thanks for your support, it is much appreciated.
Attached is the error.log when LogLevel is set to http2:trace2. (I have changed
the IP address of the access source to xxx)
Best regards.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
--- Comment #4 from kanai3id ---
I have an additional question.
I am not familiar with the core or test code of Apache HTTPD, but is
RewriteRule in the test code?
If it is a normal SSI, it is not a problem. The garbled characters occur when
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65737
Joe Orton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Eissing ---
Thanks for the rewrite config. I am still unable to reproduce on my dev
machine.
The thing that is new in the module is the handling of mmap'ed file content.
Can you check if adding
H2CopyFil
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
--- Comment #6 from kanai3id ---
Created attachment 38502
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38502&action=edit
Log with H2CopyFiles on
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
--- Comment #7 from kanai3id ---
I set H2CopyFiles on but it did not change.
Please check the error_log_H2CopyFiles_on.log also attached.
(I configured H2CopyFiles on to Apache httpd 2.4.54, built with the same
configure options, and there
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66486
Bug ID: 66486
Summary: DTD HTML 3.2 Final still seen in Directory Indexes as
default in 2023
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61219
--- Comment #8 from Dan Jacobson ---
Stale DOCTYPE now has its own issue:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66486
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65737
--- Comment #5 from Horst Platz ---
ok thx for the infos and in my example case. the referre header must in the
proxy configuration.
~# vim /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default.conf
[...]
ProxyPass http://192.168.56.170:81/balancer
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65765
--- Comment #5 from Easyman ---
Thank you. It solved my problem. Thank you a million!
You can check it on both sites:
https://www.easymanandvanremovals.co.uk/
https://easymanandvanremovals.mobi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64462
Robert Kaiser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ka...@kairo.at
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66489
Bug ID: 66489
Summary: WebSockets revert to HTTP/1.1
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66490
Bug ID: 66490
Summary: ldap_simple_bind fails with "Can't contact LDAP
server" when using ldaps on OpenLDAP
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66490
--- Comment #1 from Eric Covener ---
you might get some additional debug output from the ldap library by specifying
LDAPLibraryDebug 7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66490
--- Comment #2 from apa...@kyoshiro.org ---
Created attachment 38513
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38513&action=edit
ldap debug output
Ah thanks! Didn't know about this one :)
I got a debug output that se
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66490
--- Comment #3 from Loïc ---
Well, I finally found the issue.
Adding this line to /etc/ldap/ldap.conf solved the problem:
TLS_CACERT /etc/ldap/chain.pem
I find it a bit odd as the chain just has Let's Encrypt CA certs but well.
At lea
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66494
Bug ID: 66494
Summary: [feature request] MaxRequestWorkers per vhost
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.55
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66499
Bug ID: 66499
Summary: 302 redirects when the :scheme header does not match
the connection type
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.55
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66499
--- Comment #1 from Randy Barlow ---
For what it's worth, I did find an haproxy issue from some years ago where the
meaning of this header was debated in the context of a proxy that strips TLS:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66489
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Eissing ---
WebSocket over HTTP/2 is not implemented. That might explain the lack of
documentation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66490
Loïc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66489
--- Comment #2 from stesau...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Stefan Eissing from comment #1)
> WebSocket over HTTP/2 is not implemented. That might explain the lack of
> documentation.
If implemented would it be in mod_http2 and mod_proxy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66489
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Eissing ---
Well, mod_http2 would need to implement the "front-end" part. The backend would
then use the same mod_proxy mechanism as the http/1.1 parts, I assume.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66517
Bug ID: 66517
Summary: Segmentation faults with Apache >=2.4.50 mpm_event and
PHP
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.55
Hardware: PC
Status:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483
--- Comment #8 from kanai3id ---
Hello.
Apahe 2.4.56 has been released. It may be unrelated, but mod_http2 fix was
included and I checked it, but it did not improve.
I took a wild guess and "LoadModule" mod_http2.so from Apache 2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63096
CI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cruz.iba...@att.net
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66525
Bug ID: 66525
Summary: document when certificate/key/CRL/etc. files are
reloaded
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66526
Bug ID: 66526
Summary: provide a better way to reload TLS
certificates/keys/etc.
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66526
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Eissing ---
I'm afraid this would open a can of worms and make configuration handling more
error prone. Additionally, I see impacts of this on server performance, too.
In ACME support for Apache httpd (mod_md
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66526
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Anton Mitterer ---
Hey.
Would it really open so much?
I'd have expected that there are only rather few (use-)cases where one wants to
independently reload parts of the configuration:
- Apache&#
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66316
--- Comment #15 from de...@outlook.de ---
Comment on attachment 38417
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38417
pmap output
>1887503: httpd -X
>55e33187a000 92K r httpd
>55e331891000324K
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66316
de...@outlook.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@outlook.de
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62161
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FixedInTrunk
--- Comment #5 from Yann
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66486
Keith Carangelo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kca...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65760
--- Comment #2 from Matt ---
Resource leaks in mod_ssl_ct.c can occur when resources allocated during the
execution of the code are not properly released when they are no longer needed.
These can include file descriptors, memory allocations
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66517
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66517
Elliot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534
Bug ID: 66534
Summary: Using the requestbody() method reads and returns the
body of the HTTP request but it also REMOVES the body
of the request.
Product: Apache httpd-2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534
henrychen7...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
CC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Eric
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66537
Bug ID: 66537
Summary: large request serving times logged since upgrade to
2.4.56
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.56
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66539
Bug ID: 66539
Summary: Crash in mod_log_config when using the new mod_http2
in httpd-2.4.56
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.56
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66539
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Eissing ---
Created attachment 38527
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38527&action=edit
h2 request headers clone instead of copy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66539
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Eissing ---
Thanks for the detailed report! Could you test if the attached patch resolve
the issue? Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66539
--- Comment #3 from Teodor Milkov ---
I no longer see segmentation faults with the provided patch. Thank you for your
swift reaction!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66539
Stefan Eissing changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65584
Srivathshan MHRIL changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||srivathshan.k814@mahindraho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65584
Srivathshan MHRIL changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|srivathshan.k814@mahindraho |
|lidays.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45023
--- Comment #30 from klokhuiswer...@gmail.com ---
the issue with Comment 26 seems to me that if you send a request with
`if-none-match: "0-5debc62fd30dd-br"` it'll respond with `etag:
"0-5debc62fd30dd"` (which is mi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63253
--- Comment #1 from raymon...@gmail.com ---
Looks like the problem is still there.
With
rotatelogs -l access_log.%Y-%m-%d 86400
The wrong filename will be used on the day we switch to daylight savings time.
Will the bug be fixed in a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66499
Paulo M changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mentalstring+apache@gmail.c
1701 - 1800 of 3138 matches
Mail list logo
