User (% email%)
This is to your notice that due to the incesant rate of spam mails, We are
currently upgrading our database and e-mail center and this is our final
notification to you.we have sent several messages to you without response.
Click here to UPDATE YOUR ACCOUNT.
Thanks for your unders
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 03:20:13PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:16:39PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:28:19PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:16:39PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:28:19PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
> > > wrote:
> > > > This seem
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:16:39PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:28:19PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
> > wrote:
> > > This seems to be the difference between fsck_msdos and fsck_ffs that lets
> > > fsck_
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:28:19PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
> wrote:
> > This seems to be the difference between fsck_msdos and fsck_ffs that lets
> > fsck_msdos incorrectly use the block device.
> >
> > This still works on my 512-byte
F}rsatakon'dan
Muhte~em F}rsat! "Elma Krom
Zay}flama Hap}"
F}rsatakon G|vencesiyle %65
]ndirimle 54 TL
Y
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:00:43PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> I think Philip already spotted your problem: netdb.h this is indeed a
> bug that should be fixed. Don't now how yet. These type of changes
> often are very tricky.
>
> -Otto
Quite so, I'm well aware of how tricky such can
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
wrote:
> This seems to be the difference between fsck_msdos and fsck_ffs that lets
> fsck_msdos incorrectly use the block device.
>
> This still works on my 512-byte sector msdos fs and uses the raw
> device. I think it will make your fsck/fsck
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:51:34AM -0500, Woodchuck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:24:30PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:33:23AM -0500, Woodchuck wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:00:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2012/02/21 19:15, Woodc
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:10:55PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:49:07AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > Also, when we ask for the dmesg, it's much better to post the entire dmesg.
>
> Here is dmesg from my laptop.
> My PC uses 5.0. The behaviour is the same.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:24:30PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:33:23AM -0500, Woodchuck wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:00:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2012/02/21 19:15, Woodchuck wrote:
> > > > >Fix:
> > > > surround the nitems macro wi
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:49:07AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> Also, when we ask for the dmesg, it's much better to post the entire dmesg.
Here is dmesg from my laptop.
My PC uses 5.0. The behaviour is the same.
OpenBSD 4.9 (GENERIC.MP) #819: Wed Mar 2 06:57:49 MST 2011
dera...@amd6
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:32:15PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:10:28PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:32:15PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:10:28PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:25:44AM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:33:23AM -0500, Woodchuck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:00:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2012/02/21 19:15, Woodchuck wrote:
> > > >Fix:
> > > surround the nitems macro with #if define(_KERNEL) and
> > > let any non-kernel code that has come to depen
Questa e-mail contiene informazioni html ed C( visibile solamente a client di
e-mail che supportano il formato html.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:00:39AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/02/21 19:15, Woodchuck wrote:
> > >Fix:
> > surround the nitems macro with #if define(_KERNEL) and
> > let any non-kernel code that has come to depend on it
> > choke.
>
> The userland program/s relying on this
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:10:28PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:25:44AM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:25:40PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:25:44AM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:25:40PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 21,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:25:44AM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:25:40PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:15:2
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:25:40PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:15:29PM +0200, Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
> > >> Reading 512 bytes from raw device
21 matches
Mail list logo
