On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:53:58AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> Antoine Jacoutot wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:52:15AM +0200:
> > Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> >> Changing which mode is checked won't help you because security(8)
> >> also complains that printcap(5) is a symlink rat
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Henderson wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 09:27:06PM +0100:
> Between that, a few files where I have slightly wider read
> permissions for operational reasons,
Which are those?
Would it maybe make sense to weaken these checks for everybody?
If those permissions make sense for yo
Hi Antoine,
Antoine Jacoutot wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:52:15AM +0200:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Changing which mode is checked won't help you because security(8)
>> also complains that printcap(5) is a symlink rather than the expected
>> regular file. So you would still et spammed.
>>
>>
Ignore this for now.
this may be (probably is) due to the fact X driver is out of sync with
the kernel. i'll report back after I build a new set of X, or better yet,
try a new snapshot.
--patrick
On 4/11/16, patrick keshishian wrote:
>>Synopsis: regression with -r1.69 pms0 w/Synaptics touch
>Synopsis: regression with -r1.69 pms0 w/Synaptics touchpad lenovo x120e
>Category: kernel pms driver
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 5.9
Details : OpenBSD 5.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #3: Mon Apr 11 14:16:42
PDT 2016
sidster@local:/usr/build
Trying out bridges... didn't have the working right, but this shouldn't panic.
soekris 4801 (probably doesn't matter)... very short.
OpenBSD 5.9 (GENERIC) #1561: Fri Feb 26 01:22:37 MST 2016
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor
Paul Irofti wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> I think this diff is even safer: it checks for threads entering and
> exiting the barrier while holding the mutex, and if both values are 0 it
> proceeds to destroy the barrier.
>
> I also renamed sofar to in so that the relationship between threads i