On current, there seem to be two problems with lo(4) interfaces:
1. "ifconfig lo6 up" fails
# ifconfig lo6 create
# ifconfig lo6 up
ifconfig: SIOCSIFFLAGS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
# ifconfig lo6 destroy
#
The sys/net/rdomains regress test fails because of this, and i think
sys/
On 13 January 2017 at 13:11, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> On current, there seem to be two problems with lo(4) interfaces:
>
> 1. "ifconfig lo6 up" fails
>
> # ifconfig lo6 create
> # ifconfig lo6 up
> ifconfig: SIOCSIFFLAGS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> # ifconfig lo6 destroy
> #
>
> The sy
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 13:15 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 13 January 2017 at 13:11, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > On current, there seem to be two problems with lo(4) interfaces:
> >
> > 1. "ifconfig lo6 up" fails
> >
> > # ifconfig lo6 create
> > # ifconfig lo6 up
> > ifconfig: SIOCSIFFLAG
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 01:11:07PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> On current, there seem to be two problems with lo(4) interfaces:
>
> 1. "ifconfig lo6 up" fails
>
> # ifconfig lo6 create
> # ifconfig lo6 up
> ifconfig: SIOCSIFFLAGS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> # ifconfig lo6 des
>Synopsis: pmap_remove_ptes_86: unmanaged page marked PG_PVLIST
>Category: i386 kernel
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.0
Details : OpenBSD 6.0 (GENERIC) #1917: Tue Jul 26 12:48:33 MDT 2016
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/
Mike Belopuhov(m...@belopuhov.com) on 2017.01.13 13:28:01 +0100:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 13:15 +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> > On 13 January 2017 at 13:11, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > > On current, there seem to be two problems with lo(4) interfaces:
> > >
> > > 1. "ifconfig lo6 up" fails
> > >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:54:27PM +, skin...@britvault.co.uk wrote:
> >Synopsis:pmap_remove_ptes_86: unmanaged page marked PG_PVLIST
> >Category:i386 kernel
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.0
> Details : OpenBSD 6.0 (GENERIC) #1917: Tue Jul 26 12:48:33 MDT 2016
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:54:27 + (GMT) skin...@britvault.co.uk wrote:
> savecore: writing compressed core to /var/crash/bsd.0.core.Z
> savecore: writing compressed kernel to /var/crash/bsd.0.Z
These are now in http://web.Britvault.Co.UK/tmp/
Mike Larkin wrote:
>
> Did this machine work well before? I've never seen a machine that can reliably
> mix ECC and not-ECC modules.
>
Yes, fine. 24x7 for years.
1st crash/panic seen.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:26:33PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:54:27 + (GMT) skin...@britvault.co.uk wrote:
>
> > savecore: writing compressed core to /var/crash/bsd.0.core.Z
> > savecore: writing compressed kernel to /var/crash/bsd.0.Z
>
> These are now in http://web
10 matches
Mail list logo