Shameless ping!
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:45:20PM +0200, alf wrote:
> Further investigation shows that p5-Net-SNMP sends a first packet
> unauthentified and with an empty request. Here snmpd(8) violates
> RFC 3414. It should send OIDVAL_usmErrEngineId but instead sends
> OIDVAL_usmErrSecLevel.
>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:21:53PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> So, apart from being safer for weird devices on weird implementations,
>> POSIX clearly recommends the idiom for symmetry with read(2) and
>> for compatibility with some historic
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:21:53PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> So, apart from being safer for weird devices on weird implementations,
> POSIX clearly recommends the idiom for symmetry with read(2) and
> for compatibility with some historic implementations - even though
> the importance of these r
Hi,
Todd C. Miller wrote on Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:35:45AM -0600:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:50:41 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Indeed, the above code is nonsensical.
>> It will write the same bytes repeatedly in case of partial writes.
> OK millert@
Committed, thanks for checking.
> That doe
