Re: Question about noteworthy sparc64 bugs

2018-04-12 Thread Theo de Raadt
Evan Rowley wrote: > Hello OpenBSD Devs, > > Hopefully this bug-related question will not be too off-topic. I was > curious as to the reason for continued SPARC support and saw this > interesting sentence on the sparc64 page > (https://www.openbsd.org/sparc64.html). > > "The other architectures

Question about noteworthy sparc64 bugs

2018-04-12 Thread Evan Rowley
Hello OpenBSD Devs, Hopefully this bug-related question will not be too off-topic. I was curious as to the reason for continued SPARC support and saw this interesting sentence on the sparc64 page (https://www.openbsd.org/sparc64.html). "The other architectures that OpenBSD supports have benefited

Re: rdomain/rtable 255 BGPd routes -> leaking to rdomain/rtable 0

2018-04-12 Thread Nicolas Pence
just to make sure: changing the sshd configuration fixes your problem as well? i.e. there is no bug? Putting ListenAddress $IP rdomain 255 inside sshd_config did the trick, netstat -nr -f inet was looking at it's default route table which was 255 rtable in this case. Running sshd_rtable=255 I

Re: rdomain/rtable 255 BGPd routes -> leaking to rdomain/rtable 0

2018-04-12 Thread Remi Locherer
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 07:14:57PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Nicolas Pence(nico...@pence.com.uy) on 2018.04.12 13:03:39 -0300: > > Thinking about it a little more, I've configured sshd_rtable=255 on > > /etc/rc.conf.local, > > on the non-working boxes, I'm re-checking this doing: > > > > r

Re: rdomain/rtable 255 BGPd routes -> leaking to rdomain/rtable 0

2018-04-12 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Nicolas Pence(nico...@pence.com.uy) on 2018.04.12 13:03:39 -0300: > Thinking about it a little more, I've configured sshd_rtable=255 on > /etc/rc.conf.local, > on the non-working boxes, I'm re-checking this doing: > > rcctl set sshd rtable 0 > > and changing sshd_config: > > ListenAddress $IP r

Re: rdomain/rtable 255 BGPd routes -> leaking to rdomain/rtable 0

2018-04-12 Thread Nicolas Pence
Thinking about it a little more, I've configured sshd_rtable=255 on /etc/rc.conf.local, on the non-working boxes, I'm re-checking this doing: rcctl set sshd rtable 0 and changing sshd_config: ListenAddress $IP rdomain 255 Thank you On 4/12/18 12:04, Nicolas Pence wrote: I'm using 3 differen

rdomain/rtable 255 BGPd routes -> leaking to rdomain/rtable 0

2018-04-12 Thread Nicolas Pence
I'm using 3 different rdomains, with one BGPd instance in each of them with different configurations, when using rdomain 255 some routing info is leaked into rtable 0 to the point that doesn't allow to route, this happens over a few minutes/hours of functioning (tested on two VM's with 6.2-stab