On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:56:36PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have seen a crash in the regress/sys/nfs test. It was during
> run-regress-cleanup, the last command I see is:
>
> umount -f -t nfs -h 127.0.0.1 -a || true
>
> uvm_fault(0xd0d2f2a8, 0xefff, 0, 1) -> e
> kernel: pag
On 5/16/18 10:20 AM, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
That means that the TDB has already been freed. This is possible
because the timeout sleeps on the NET_LOCK(). Diff below should prevent
that by introducing a tdb_reaper() function like we do in other parts of
the stack.
I have booted the patched
On 2018/05/16 13:37, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 5/16/18 1:07 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > You can't create a syspatch from it.
>
> I am talking about a *private* syspatch. Something that I can
> revert later to gain access to the official syspatches again.
> That should be possible.
Oh. In
It occurs after:
syncing disks... done
>Synopsis:
>Category:
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.3
Details : OpenBSD 6.3 (GENERIC.MP) #2: Sun May 6 20:07:33
CEST 2018
r...@syspatch-63-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
Architecture: OpenBSD.amd64
Machine :
On 5/16/18 1:07 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
You can't create a syspatch from it.
I am talking about a *private* syspatch. Something that I can
revert later to gain access to the official syspatches again.
That should be possible.
If you can get it tested as a patch on a self-built -stable k
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:34:57PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Thanx for the patch, but I wonder how I can create a syspatch from
> it?
You can't. The syspatch utility only installs officially signed
syspatches and you don't have the signing key.
> If I patch, build and install stable from sour
On 2018/05/16 12:34, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Thanx for the patch, but I wonder how I can create a syspatch from
> it? If I patch, build and install stable from source, then my hosts
> are cut off from the syspatch scheme. That would be highly painful.
>
> Every helpful comment is highly appreciated
On Wed, 16 May 2018 12:34:57 +0200
> Thanx for the patch, but I wonder how I can create a syspatch from
> it? If I patch, build and install stable from source, then my hosts
> are cut off from the syspatch scheme. That would be highly painful.
>
> Every helpful comment is highly appreciated.
Yo
Thanx for the patch, but I wonder how I can create a syspatch from
it? If I patch, build and install stable from source, then my hosts
are cut off from the syspatch scheme. That would be highly painful.
Every helpful comment is highly appreciated.
Harri
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 11:35:42AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 09/05/18(Wed) 12:13, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:23:41AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 09/05/18(Wed) 07:48, Artturi Alm wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:44:39AM +0300, Artturi Alm wrote:
>
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 09:24:05 +0200
> From: Theo Buehler
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:05:07PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:34:13PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When executing the posixtestsuite port, the i386 kernel crashes.
> > > I
On 16/05/18(Wed) 08:06, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
Thanks for the report.
> hopefully its allowed to repost this message here:
>
> One gateway running 6.3 ran into the debugger last night. Last words:
>
> login: kernel: protection fault trap, code=0
> Stopped at export_sa+0x5c: movl
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:05:07PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:34:13PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When executing the posixtestsuite port, the i386 kernel crashes.
> > It is this one:
> >
> > /usr/local/libexec/posixtestsuite/conformance/interface
14 matches
Mail list logo
