Re: ospfd: passive p2p interfaces don't work

2019-04-22 Thread Remi Locherer
Hi Stefan On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:16:32PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > I want to announce a host-route to the address of a tun0 interface > over OSPF. The config snippet I use for this looks like: > > interface tun0:217.197.85.96 { > passive > depend

Re: ospfd: passive p2p interfaces don't work

2019-04-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:14:30AM +0200, Remi Locherer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:16:32PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > I believe this is a bug. I expect to be able to announce the address > > of a passive point-to-point interface with ospfd. > > > > The problem is that ospfd only o

Re: ospfd: passive p2p interfaces don't work

2019-04-22 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Remi Locherer(remi.loche...@relo.ch) on 2019.04.22 11:14:30 +0200: > Hi Stefan > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:16:32PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > I want to announce a host-route to the address of a tun0 interface > > over OSPF. The config snippet I use for this looks like: > > > > i

Re: X lock up 2019-04-19 snapshot with Intel graphics

2019-04-22 Thread Krystian Lewandowski
My system was freezing for a few days, regardless of "intel" or "modesetting" driver. It was still crashing after this one: 67aad1b29dac420da1cbc62dfe6bceddaec11b56 With this one, and after running for a few hours, no crashes: 67aad1b29dac420da1cbc62dfe6bceddaec11b56 Note: while it was prone to

Re: X lock up 2019-04-19 snapshot with Intel graphics

2019-04-22 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Sat, Apr 20, 2019 at 04:42:29PM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > * Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > > There is some kind of use after free or double free that triggers only > > when opting into the 'intel' driver on recent hardware instead of the > > 'modesetting' default. > > > > As you ar