Hi Alexandr,
I've tested this and can confirm it works. Attempted TCP sessions get
an immediate 'Connection refused' error after the first ICMP port
unreachable error.
Personally, I like it. Thank you for the quick fix!
Paul
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 05:56:38PM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
Il giorno mer 30 ott 2019 alle 21:15 Ted Unangst ha
scritto:
> Ted Unangst wrote:
> > I'm not sure where the bug is exactly (seems probable it could be an
> apple
> > problem), but for the record...
>
> I think this was fixed with an apple update? Nothing in the release notes
> of
> course, but i
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 04:14:53PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Ted Unangst wrote:
> > I'm not sure where the bug is exactly (seems probable it could be an apple
> > problem), but for the record...
>
> I think this was fixed with an apple update? Nothing in the release notes of
> course, but it doe
Ted Unangst wrote:
> I'm not sure where the bug is exactly (seems probable it could be an apple
> problem), but for the record...
I think this was fixed with an apple update? Nothing in the release notes of
course, but it doesn't seem to happen anymore.
Hello,
So I did poke around and it looks like tcp_notify() requires a small tweak. I
did check NetBSD and it looks like NetBSD is suffering from the same glitch
(unless I'm missing something).
The change below makes tcp_notify() to indicate ICMP unreachable errors for not
connected sockets immedi
Hello Paul,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:41:28AM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Hi Alexandr,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:14:09AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> | Hello Paul,
> |
> | interesting exercise it has never come to my mind to try something like
> that.
> | I did poke to RFCs and
Hi Alexandr,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:14:09AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
| Hello Paul,
|
| interesting exercise it has never come to my mind to try something like that.
| I did poke to RFCs and found 1122 [1]. I'm not RFC guru so I hope this
| partcular one is not superseded or updated b
Hello Paul,
interesting exercise it has never come to my mind to try something like that.
I did poke to RFCs and found 1122 [1]. I'm not RFC guru so I hope this
partcular one is not superseded or updated by more recent one.
If I understand quotation below right, then host TCP stack should just i
