On Tue, 19 May 2020 23:44:18 -
"Andrés V." wrote:
> 6.6 works without issues. I made a clean 6.7 installation, selecting auto
> loading
> xenodm, finish, reboot, log in and after a trying to resize the default
> xterm it
> freezes. But:
> -Mouse moves
> -No cursor
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 09:12:29PM -0400, Demi M. Obenour wrote:
> On 2020-05-19 16:30, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the detailed report.
> >
> >>iwm0: sending assoc_req to 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f on channel 6 mode 11g
> >>iwm0: association failed (status 10) for
On 2020-05-19 21:15, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Demi M. Obenour wrote:
>>>
>> Would it be possible to get an errata patch for this, so that -stable
>> users can get it fixed?
>
> If we decide. Once it settles in tree.
>
> For now, no.
>
> I'm think you don't get it. That change may break
Demi M. Obenour wrote:
> On 2020-05-19 16:30, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the detailed report.
> >
> >>iwm0: sending assoc_req to 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f on channel 6 mode 11g
> >>iwm0: association failed (status 10) for 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f
> >>iwm0: association timed
On 2020-05-19 16:30, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the detailed report.
>
>> iwm0: sending assoc_req to 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f on channel 6 mode 11g
>> iwm0: association failed (status 10) for 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f
>> iwm0: association timed out for 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f
>
> I saw
>Synopsis: athn(4) AR9287 unstable and poor network quality
>Category: system amd64
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.7
Details : OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Sat May 16 16:33:02 MDT 2020
r...@syspatch-67-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/
GENERIC.MP
Architecture:
Hi,
Thanks for the detailed report.
> iwm0: sending assoc_req to 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f on channel 6 mode 11g
> iwm0: association failed (status 10) for 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f
> iwm0: association timed out for 18:e8:29:11:2b:2f
I saw the same problem on my access point. This is fixed in
Apologies for the duplicate email. I had some issues posting with protonmail.
>Synopsis: pkg-config modversion edge case is not implemented
>Category: system
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.7
Details : OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #198: Mon May 18
20:33:28
>Synopsis: ure RTL8153 panics on 6.7 - was stable on 6.6
>Category:
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.7
Details : OpenBSD 6.7 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Sat May 16 16:33:02 MDT 2020
Hi all!
So this is a panic I noticed now with the fresh 6.7 release. I guess it's the
same as [1] with multi-threaded applications (in this case collectd) being the
culprit. It seems only bsd.mp is affected.
[1] - https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs=157080005817280=2
Panic, trace, dmesg, etc.
ok, I need a little bit more info than that.
Can you build a -current kernel with the diff below and send me the
(complete) dmesg output it produces?
Index: arch/amd64/pci/acpipci.c
===
RCS file:
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 01:28:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/05/19 06:15, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 May 2020 14:04:37 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > > In 18 years, yes. But the -O2 case should work whartever the default
> > > is for mfs.
> >
> > I agree that -O2
On 2020/05/19 06:15, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 14:04:37 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > In 18 years, yes. But the -O2 case should work whartever the default
> > is for mfs.
>
> I agree that -O2 should work for mfs, I'm just wasn't sure that
> should be the default for mfs.
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:15:15AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2020 14:04:37 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > In 18 years, yes. But the -O2 case should work whartever the default
> > is for mfs.
>
> I agree that -O2 should work for mfs, I'm just wasn't sure that
> should be
On Tue, 19 May 2020 14:04:37 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> In 18 years, yes. But the -O2 case should work whartever the default
> is for mfs.
I agree that -O2 should work for mfs, I'm just wasn't sure that
should be the default for mfs. We don't actually have a way to
specify the ffs version
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:06:36AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:49:23AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any advantage to mfs defaulting to ffs2?
> > >
> > > - todd
> > >
> >
> > In 18 years, yes. But the -O2 case should
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:49:23AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>
> > Is there any advantage to mfs defaulting to ffs2?
> >
> > - todd
> >
>
> In 18 years, yes. But the -O2 case should work whartever the default
> is for mfs.
The stored timestamps are unsigned. Are
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:49:23AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Is there any advantage to mfs defaulting to ffs2?
>
> - todd
>
In 18 years, yes. But the -O2 case should work whartever the default
is for mfs.
-Otto
Is there any advantage to mfs defaulting to ffs2?
- todd
On 2020/05/19 11:36, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> >Synopsis:Mounting MFS filesystem does not preserve directory permissions
> >of mount point
> >Category:system
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.7
> Details : OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #198: Mon May 18
>Synopsis: Mounting MFS filesystem does not preserve directory permissions
>of mount point
>Category: system
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 6.7
Details : OpenBSD 6.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #198: Mon May 18
20:33:28 MDT 2020
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:43:10PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 18:09:36 +0200
> > From: Moises Simon
> >
> > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 04:59:22PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 16:39:06 +0200
> > > > From: Moises Simon
> > > >
> > > > On
22 matches
Mail list logo
