Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:20:39AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Doctor! Doctor! It hurts when I stick a knife in here!
> >
> > When you do weird, harsh, or unrealistic packet filtering, application
> > software will occasionally log that you are losing packets which
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:20:39AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Doctor! Doctor! It hurts when I stick a knife in here!
>
> When you do weird, harsh, or unrealistic packet filtering, application
> software will occasionally log that you are losing packets which should
> not be filtered, to alert t
Doctor! Doctor! It hurts when I stick a knife in here!
When you do weird, harsh, or unrealistic packet filtering, application
software will occasionally log that you are losing packets which should
not be filtered, to alert that normal network operation isn't occuring.
That is to be expected. It
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 05:18:33PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> Sorry, this doesn't make any sense.
>
> I could never reproduce the -1 or > 65535 case reliably, I see it once
> in a while, but I can't trigger it. I also can't reproduce it with your
> instructions.
>
> As far as I can work out th
On 2023-04-13 21:01 +02, "Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 08:28:05PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>> /cut
>> > Apr 6 14:43:05 polarstern unwind[97893]: bad packet: too large: 65552 -
>> > pool.ntp.org. IN A