>So you personally vouch for the machine code in the official release not
>containing any hidden surprises at present?
I don't vouch for anything, I don't have to. If you don't like it go
scuttle off to someone else who satisfies you.
But your sha256 invocation is going to solve nothing.
>By the
So you personally vouch for the machine code in the official release not
containing any hidden surprises at present? By the way there is a bug in
the text of the FAQ for installing the xenocara source that clobbers usr
because it's missing a mkdir -p command for an expected directory.
On Thu., Jun
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 03:52:57 +
James Cook wrote:
> Example 1: I type some text in an editor and a few consecutive
> letters are left out.
>
> Example 2: I type a short piece of text like "openbsd", but
> instead I see "open" with the "n" repeating
>
"Schech, C. W. (\"Connor\")" wrote:
> I want to avoid derailing into trusting trust or designing a system
> from scratch. The official build not being portable and the recursion
> it introduces is orthogonal to system integrity.. Adding say, official
> distcc support, and bringing back say, GCC a
I want to avoid derailing into trusting trust or designing a system
from scratch. The official build not being portable and the recursion
it introduces is orthogonal to system integrity.. Adding say, official
distcc support, and bringing back say, GCC avoids that recursion. I am
concerned with simp
Yes, I understand that OpenBSD is self-hosting, and it seems like an
infinite recursion with no base case. The base case is actually the
last version with GCC support that's no longer in the CDN archive. And
the Computer Store stopped carrying the CDs.
Do you really trust that there is enough entr
