Re: makefs: sporadic segfaults with FAT32

2023-11-30 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 05:59:27AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote: > -current amd64 sometimes dumps core when creating a FAT32 image. > Minimal reproducer below; other FS types, sizes or files are stable, > FAT32 seems to be the culprit. I don't have time to look into this. > > $ cd /usr/src/

Re: makefs: sporadic segfaults with FAT32

2023-11-30 Thread Miod Vallat
> It always chokes on fp->fsisig4. Well, that's what you get from reading 512 bytes and casting the buffer to a 1024 byte struct. The following diff ought to solve this. Index: msdos/msdosfs_vfsops.c === RCS file: /OpenBSD/src/usr.s

makefs: sporadic segfaults with FAT32

2023-11-30 Thread Klemens Nanni
-current amd64 sometimes dumps core when creating a FAT32 image. Minimal reproducer below; other FS types, sizes or files are stable, FAT32 seems to be the culprit. I don't have time to look into this. $ cd /usr/src/*bin/makefs $ make DEBUG=-g $ mkdir empty/ $ unt

Re: kernel diagnostic assertion "st->timeout == PFTM_UNLINKED" failed: file "

2023-11-30 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 08:44:19AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > Hello Johan, > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:24:59PM -0500, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > > > > so my machine paniced today, but the panic this time is completely > > different. > > I don't know if it's related to this issue, the p

Re: ntpd constraint don't use v6 when v6 is only there after ntpd start-up

2023-11-30 Thread Paul de Weerd
Thank you Otto, this fixes the issue for me. After a brief wait (15 seconds), constraints are resolved again and then accessed over IPv6. Paul 2023-11-30T13:15:42.187Z mozzarella ntpd[27086]: constraints configured but none available 2023-11-30T13:15:42.187Z mozzarella ntpd[27086]: Reset constr

Re: kernel diagnostic assertion "st->timeout == PFTM_UNLINKED" failed: file "

2023-11-30 Thread Johan Huldtgren
hello, On 2023-11-30 8:44, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > Hello Johan, > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:24:59PM -0500, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > > > > so my machine paniced today, but the panic this time is completely > > different. > > I don't know if it's related to this issue, the patch, or a co

Re: ntpd constraint don't use v6 when v6 is only there after ntpd start-up

2023-11-30 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:43:57PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:57:15AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 08:49:55AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 04:19:07PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > >