Re: repeated NTP peers in OpenNTPD

2023-12-10 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 09:18:32PM +, guilherme.janc...@yandex.com wrote: > >Synopsis:Repeated NTP peers in OpenNTPD > >Category:user > >Environment: > System : OpenBSD 7.4 > Details : OpenBSD 7.4 (GENERIC.MP) #0: Sun Oct 22 12:13:42 MDT 2023 >

Re: tmux requests ANSI answer-back but doesn't consume reply from rxvt

2023-12-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
Upstream has fixed it but not made a new release yet. https://github.com/exg/rxvt-unicode/commit/417b540d6dba67d440e3617bc2cf6d7cea1ed968 -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 10 December 2023 07:54:22 Nicholas Marriott wrote: We do detect rxvt-unicode already so it woul

PF doesn't apply filter rule with max on relays

2023-12-10 Thread Luca Di Gregorio
# uname -a OpenBSD XXX.my.domain 7.4 GENERIC#0 amd64 I need to allow only one connection to an application from relayd. # cat /etc/relayd.conf table { lo } http protocol xxx_https { tls keypair yyy.zzz.org tcp nodelay } relay xxx { listen on 0.0.0.0 port 10004 tls

make(1) and the percent in AT&T variable substitution

2023-12-10 Thread Lucas de Sena
I could identify the following bugs in make(1), concerning the "%" character on a variable substitution: - If there's no "%" in the left or right hand side string of a variable substitution, make(1) prepends one into them. Thus ${SRCS:.c=.o} is equivalent to ${SRCS:%.c=%.o}. That's fine wh

Re: PF doesn't apply filter rule with max on relays

2023-12-10 Thread Luca Di Gregorio
Hi, in my /etc/pf.conf I have the line: set skip on lo That is why the rules of my previous email don't work. If I comment # set skip on lo the rules work, but the ... keep state (max 1) drops the SYN of the second connection, so the session in relayd is not closed immediately. Does anyone know i

Re: kernel diagnostic assertion "st->timeout == PFTM_UNLINKED" failed: file "

2023-12-10 Thread Johan Huldtgren
hello, On 2023-12-08 15:09, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:58:31PM -0500, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > > hello, > > > [skip] > > > > Would this apply against 7.4 or only -current? Machine is currently > > running 7.4+syspatches (and sashan@ patch from earlier in this thr