On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 06:18:23PM +0100, colin.i.k...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Synopsis:sincosl() segmentation fault
> >Category:library
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 7.5
> Details : OpenBSD 7.5 (GENERIC.MP) #82: Wed Mar 20 15:48:40 MDT 2024
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:31:47AM -0500, Nathaniel Griswold wrote:
>
> >Synopsis: Assertion !cold failed in drm after console ctrl-alt-del
> >Category: system
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 7.5
> Details : OpenBSD 7.5 (GENERIC.MP) #82: Wed Mar 20 15:48:40 MDT 2024
>
>Synopsis: sincosl() segmentation fault
>Category: library
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.5
Details : OpenBSD 7.5 (GENERIC.MP) #82: Wed Mar 20 15:48:40 MDT 2024
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 12:03:04PM GMT, Alexander Klimov wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Actually I was working on a way to create a degraded RAID.
> As the ioctl create RAID syscall takes a list of dev_t,
> I tried NODEV for Not yet Online DEVice. ;-)
> I expected the kernel to complain. But
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 05:26:15PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 04:06:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:18:31 +0300
> > > From: Vitaliy Makkoveev
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 04:06:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:18:31 +0300
> > From: Vitaliy Makkoveev
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > >
> > > On the other side, would that make sense to have a NET_LOCK()-free
> > >
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:18:31 +0300
> From: Vitaliy Makkoveev
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> >
> > On the other side, would that make sense to have a NET_LOCK()-free
> > sysctl path?
> >
>
> To me it's better to remove uvm_vslock() from network
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> On the other side, would that make sense to have a NET_LOCK()-free
> sysctl path?
>
To me it's better to remove uvm_vslock() from network related sysctl
paths. uvm_vslock() used to avoid context switch in the uiomove() call
to
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>
> So the issue here is due to NFS entering the network stack after the
> VFS. Alexander, Vitaly are we far from a NET_LOCK()-free sosend()?
> Is something we should consider?
>
We are close enough, but I want to unlock raw and
Hello everyone!
Actually I was working on a way to create a degraded RAID.
As the ioctl create RAID syscall takes a list of dev_t,
I tried NODEV for Not yet Online DEVice. ;-)
I expected the kernel to complain. But instead it crashed.
How to reproduce:
1) Apply the diff below.
2) Build (just)
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:08:13 +0200
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> On 27/04/24(Sat) 13:44, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 02:48:32PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I agree. Now I'd be very grateful if someone could dig into WITNESS to
> > > figure out why we
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > With the patch, the nfsnode-vmmaplk reversal looks like this:
>
> So the issue here is due to NFS entering the network stack after the
> VFS. Alexander, Vitaly are we far from a NET_LOCK()-free sosend()?
> Is something we
On 27/04/24(Sat) 13:44, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 02:48:32PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > [...]
> > I agree. Now I'd be very grateful if someone could dig into WITNESS to
> > figure out why we see such reports. Are these false positive or are we
> > missing data from the
13 matches
Mail list logo
