Re: Minor doc-vs-implemention conflict in /etc/daily vs test(1)

2024-06-17 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hello Theo, Theo de Raadt wrote on Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 06:06:41PM -0600: > I am finding myself in agreement. > Have we decided who will die on the hill? You volunteering? Be careful, jsg@ apparently has impressively heavy artillery in place that will blast you to shreds before you can even

Re: Minor doc-vs-implemention conflict in /etc/daily vs test(1)

2024-06-17 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 12:10:03AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Not a bug. > But which one is preferable, test -L or test -h? > > TLDR: > If you follow David Korn, -L is the way to go. > If you feel nostalgic about old SunOS, -h looks nicer. > Both were standardized in POSIX Issue 6 (2001), with

Re: Minor doc-vs-implemention conflict in /etc/daily vs test(1)

2024-06-17 Thread Todd C . Miller
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:10:03 +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > I admit that usually, when there are two equivalent syntaxes, deprecating > one of them makes sense. But in this case, with POSIX setting both in > stone over 20 years ago, attempting to die on that particular molehill > seems pointless

Re: Minor doc-vs-implemention conflict in /etc/daily vs test(1)

2024-06-17 Thread Theo de Raadt
I am finding myself in agreement. Have we decided who will die on the hill? Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Not a bug. > But which one is preferable, test -L or test -h? > > TLDR: > If you follow David Korn, -L is the way to go. > If you feel nostalgic about old SunOS, -h looks nicer. > Both were

Re: Minor doc-vs-implemention conflict in /etc/daily vs test(1)

2024-06-17 Thread Tim Chase
On 2024-06-18 00:10, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hence i suggest the patch below; OK? Resolving the the apparent conflict of "don't use it" vs using it by making both permissible works for me. Thanks for researching the history on this and aligning them! -tkc

Re: Minor doc-vs-implemention conflict in /etc/daily vs test(1)

2024-06-17 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Not a bug. But which one is preferable, test -L or test -h? TLDR: If you follow David Korn, -L is the way to go. If you feel nostalgic about old SunOS, -h looks nicer. Both were standardized in POSIX Issue 6 (2001), with no preference given there. Both always worked on OpenBSD, no matter which

dhcp6leased problem on pppoe0 timeout

2024-06-17 Thread Sebastien Marie
Hi, I am using dhcp6leased on my gateway to get ipv6-pd over pppoe from my ISP. The problem is when the pppoe0 disconnect/reconnect due to LCP keepalive timeout, my ISP consider the dhcp leased as not valid anymore, and I need to re-ask a fresh one (running `dhcp6leasectl pppoe0` is enough) to

Re: panic: pool_do_get: mcl2k free list modified

2024-06-17 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 16/06/24(Sun) 20:37, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 18:56:14 +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > > > Does ist also happend, if you disable LRO? > > > > try: > > > > ifconfig vio0 -tcplro > > Thanks for the cue, it doesn't happen indeed. This is a/the wg(4) race.