"Theo de Raadt" writes:
> Noone uses telnet, we (mostly) killed it!
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/images/tshirt-9b.jpg
>
> There is no way in heck this code is going to be converted in OpenBSD
> to use strtol(), which is even more willing to eat junk.
I don't disagree. Especially on the strtol par
Hi,
Earlier this week I committed this change in GNU Inetutils [1]. When
sending the 'send dont ' telnet command, the value is not checked
for overflow. Likewise for 'do', 'will', 'wont'.
Another GNU Inetutils developer segfaults doing 'send dont 2147483648'
and 'send dont 9223372034707292160' bu
Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> +#ifndef _MODE_T_DEFINED_
>> +#define _MODE_T_DEFINED_
>> +typedef __mode_tmode_t;
>> +#endif
>
> It may be safer to drop this bit...
>
>> +void strmode(mode_t, char *);
> ...and use __mode_t in the prototype and implementation.
Someone including might expect
Hi,
I noticed that strmode(3) says that the first argument should be
mode_t. OpenBSD declares it with int which is not compatible since
mode_t appears to be unsigned, from what I can tell.
NetBSD fixed this a long time ago and FreeBSD did the same before the
14.0 release.
Apologies for the lack
