On 9/15/22 18:58, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 03:27:30PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Somewhere between 7.1 release and -current, X quit working
on this machine. It is a really lousy machine, wireless
doesn't work, slow, etc., and it cost $80 new (and is
currently $60), so
On 8/10/22 00:42, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 10:29:41AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
On 8/9/22 09:36, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:28:06AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > When looking at top what does Xorg have for WAIT?
> >
> >
On 8/9/22 09:36, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 10:28:06AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> When looking at top what does Xorg have for WAIT?
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIMECPU COMMAND
41914 _x11 -22 -1 15M 26M idle schto 0:01 0
Back from vacation, sorry for the delay in responding...
On 7/28/22 10:04, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 09:56:21AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
On 7/26/22 8:43 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:34:14PM +0100, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul
On 7/26/22 8:43 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:34:14PM +0100, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 03:48:19PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> Sigh. collect info, leave out most basic part: what I mean
> by "X quit working"...
I checked your Xorg.0.
On 7/25/22 4:34 PM, Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 03:48:19PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Sigh. collect info, leave out most basic part: what I mean
by "X quit working"...
I checked your Xorg.0.log and it looks familiar. Please look for post
"X11 hangs on
On 7/25/22 3:27 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
Somewhere between 7.1 release and -current, X quit working
on this machine. It is a really lousy machine, wireless
doesn't work, slow, etc., and it cost $80 new (and is
currently $60), so "What do you expect?" is a valid response.
But in ca
On 2019-10-29 15:35, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
...
>
> This is not true; a little script their are more sizes failing. With -p 00:
> 31 nok
> 95 nok
> 151 nok
> 247 nok
> 311 nok
> 375 nok
> 407 nok
> 471 nok
> 503 nok
> 759 nok
> 791 nok
> 823 nok
> 855 nok
> 983 nok
> 1015 nok
>
> With other -p
On 7/24/19 8:49 PM, Nick Holland wrote:
> This machine seems to have a problem with acpimadt(4).
>
> It will not run bsd.rd for an install or upgrade. It hangs
> seemingly indefinitely at "root on ..." after otherwise seeming
> to booted successfully.
>
>
On 7/25/19 2:24 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 21:01:43 +0100
>> From: Stuart Henderson
>>
>> Posting additional information back to the mailing list, I'm not
>> sure what would be causing it to stop at this point ..
>
> That's where interrupts get turned on. If there is an
This machine seems to have a problem with acpimadt(4).
It will not run bsd.rd for an install or upgrade. It hangs
seemingly indefinitely at "root on ..." after otherwise seeming
to booted successfully.
When running bsd.mp, the system is sluggish and, according to top,
busy doing nothing:
load
On 6/10/19 9:05 AM, athomp...@merlin.mb.ca wrote:
>>Synopsis: fsck doesn't always flag clean after filesystem corruption
>>Category: system
>>Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 6.5
> Details : OpenBSD 6.5 (GENERIC.MP) #1: Mon May 27 18:27:59 CEST 2019
>
On 6/6/19 2:23 AM, Hyrundo Publishing Association wrote:
> Hello Sirs at OpenBSD
>
> this brief report is not a proper “bugâ€, but definitely a drawback to be
> taken into account for new users: I tried everything possible but cannot make
> the OpenBSD installation work on my laptop through
On 4/24/19 11:45 AM, Elijah wrote:
...
> If I say disable acpi at the boot prompt, it does boot.
Now, I'm not one to criticize someone for being wordy and not saying
much, but... really, that's the only line of even the slightest value in
your report. And it ain't much.
Disabling acpi is a
On 12/12/18 01:58, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 09:42:29AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 02:22:01PM -0500, Adam Stouffer wrote:
>>
>> > On 11/17/2018 10:58 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Yes, the fix is "don't use a single root partition" and
SK-650043DFAD4A2A17s4, BSD)
bge0: link state changed to UP
uhid0 on uhub9
uhid0: on usbus4
Thanks for scrolling this far down...
Nick.
On 07/01/18 15:05, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 06/27/18 08:16, Nick Holland wrote:
>> Cute little Atom powered disk box, but it seems the AHCI(-like?)
On 06/27/18 08:16, Nick Holland wrote:
> Cute little Atom powered disk box, but it seems the AHCI(-like?)
> interfaces aren't working properly on OpenBSD. This system booted
> from the on-board USB flash (PXE boot/install) and has a 1T SATA
> disk that was recognized during POST.
&
Cute little Atom powered disk box, but it seems the AHCI(-like?)
interfaces aren't working properly on OpenBSD. This system booted
from the on-board USB flash (PXE boot/install) and has a 1T SATA
disk that was recognized during POST.
Flipping the BIOS knob for SATA from AHCI to "compatibility"
On 10/26/15 15:04, Bo Brantén wrote:
>
> Now it works thanks to advice from Bryan Steele to switch BIOS from RAID
> to IDE, I post a new dmesg here if anyone is interrested.
Try switching to AHCI if you want to get some serious performance out of
it...
Many linux distros also refuse to touch
On 11/16/14 10:12, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
On 16 November 2014 09:35, Benjamin Baier program...@netzbasis.de wrote:
Hello.
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/5.6/i386/INSTALL.linux is missing.
Found because http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#Multibooting links to it.
SInce INSTALL.linux
On 09/25/14 03:16, ML mail wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your detailed analysis of my situation.
I started first with updating my AMI BIOS firmware and now
have the latest version available from July 2014, before it
was a version of February 2014.
So what I tried is to format my USB key as
On 06/20/14 09:17, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
On 20 June 2014 08:27, Jiri B ji...@devio.us wrote:
I changed partition id from A6 to NTFS of running OpenBSD
5.5 (16.-18.6. amd64 snapshot) and after a while OS freezed.
Reproduce steps:
- 5.5 snapshot amd64
(under RHEVM Linux/KVM: virtio
On 04/20/14 17:41, k...@bitflop.com wrote:
Hi
Below is a diff for /www/faq/upgrade55.html with a suggested
paragraph showing which files to download if doing an upgrading
without install kernel.
I could not use sendbug on this box, but I hope the diff is usefull
still.
-- Kind regards
When setting up wireless for someone, tripped across this one:
# ifconfig ral0 nwkey 0x4646464646 - note: 10 hex digits
# ifconfig ral0
ral0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:18:39:15:60:82
priority: 4
groups:
On 04/05/14 20:45, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
On 5 April 2014 16:00, Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
When setting up wireless for someone, tripped across this one:
# ifconfig ral0 nwkey 0x4646464646 - note: 10 hex digits
# ifconfig ral0
ral0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST
On 03/18/14 14:44, jungleboogie0 wrote:
Hi All,
I followed these instructions on how to install openBSD 5.5 snapshot onto
my beaglebone:
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/armv7/INSTALL.armv7
ok, you installed snapshots
But the problem now is with packages. I really don't want
On 03/18/14 15:38, jungleboogie0 wrote:
Hi Stuart,
the openbsd group doesn't have a BBB?
I replied to Nick's letter but I forgot to reply ALL. Is 5.5 going to be
released next week?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#Next
Nick.
Synopsis: absurd packet loss for some packet sizes on Beaglebone Black
Category: armv7
Environment:
System : OpenBSD 5.4
Details : OpenBSD 5.4-current (GENERIC-OMAP) #11: Tue Oct 8
08:49:25 CEST 2013
On 12/13/12 08:56, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 08/12/12(Sat) 23:43, Nick Holland wrote:
On 11/11/12 16:13, Brynet wrote:
It seems that macppc snapshots are broken on this model.
The RAMDISK kernel never reaches userland, it gets as far as mounting
root (root on rd0a..) and then.. stops
On 11/18/12 18:03, Luke Duguid wrote:
* http://www.openbsd.org/faq/anoncvs.html link broken, referenced from
http://www.openbsd.org/faq//faq5.html#BldGetSrc*
no. you doubled up the //'s in that URL, that breaks the relative links:
$ grepanon cvs.html faq5.html
This can be done by using an a
found this one recently, runs 4.9, won't run current or 5.0, breakage
happened between 2011/05/28 snapshot and 2011/06/02 snapshot:
Synopsis: early boot panic post 5/28/2011 snapshot
Category: i386 kernel
Environment:
System : OpenBSD 4.9
Details : OpenBSD
that did it!
Nick.
On 12/04/11 12:16, Miod Vallat wrote:
Please try this:
Index: pci/pci_machdep.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/i386/pci/pci_machdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -p -r1.66 pci_machdep.c
---
On 12/04/11 14:25, Mark Kettenis wrote:
I'd prefer to fix it with the diff below, to help the diffability with
the amd64 codebase.
I confirm this also seems to fix my p90.
Nick.
Index: pci_machdep.c
===
RCS file:
On 02/23/11 18:21, Silvio Bandeira wrote:
How can I redirect the output of 'trace' and 'ps' in ddb to a file?
Thanks in advance.
with 'vi' (or mg, or emacs). yeah, not fun, I know, I know very vividly
and repeatedly, so I don't want to hear the complaints. :)
Think about what you ask,
34 matches
Mail list logo
