Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2021-10-27 Thread Klemens Nanni
(moving Cc to bugs@) On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:33:55PM +0100, Andrew Grillet wrote: > I reported this problem in 2019, and was asked to provide data for > diagnosis. > Unfortunately, I was not able to do so at the time. Thanks for coming back to this. Please provide boot logs, specifically wha

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2021-10-27 Thread Andrew Grillet
Thanks ... Oracle Advanced Lights Out Manager CMT v1.7.9 Sun-Fire-T2000 System Firmware 6.7.10 2010/07/14 16:35 Host flash versions: OBP 4.30.4.b 2010/07/09 13:48 Hypervisor 1.7.3.c 2010/07/09 15:14 POST 4.30.4.b 2010/07/09 14:24 AFAIK, this is the latest available publicly. I had to re

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2021-11-01 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 04:22:27PM +0100, Andrew Grillet wrote: > Thanks ... > > Oracle Advanced Lights Out Manager CMT v1.7.9 > Sun-Fire-T2000 System Firmware 6.7.10 2010/07/14 16:35 > Host flash versions: >OBP 4.30.4.b 2010/07/09 13:48 >Hypervisor 1.7.3.c 2010/07/09 15:14 >POST 4.30

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2021-11-01 Thread Andrew Grillet
HI I know for sure 6.5 does not work. I think 6.4 also did not work, because I thought it was a hardware issue at the time, and 6.5 came round before I got a machine up again, but I did not write anything down. I can't say which versions of ldomctl are involved, because there is no "version" opti

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2021-11-02 Thread Andrew Grillet
Hi, I have found my notes, and OBSD 6.4 ldomctl definitely does not produce a workable config on a T1000. Andrew On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 18:39, Andrew Grillet wrote: > HI > > I know for sure 6.5 does not work. I think 6.4 also did not work, because > I thought it was a hardware > issue at the ti

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2021-11-02 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Andrew Grillet > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:13:16 + > > Hi, > > I have found my notes, and OBSD 6.4 ldomctl definitely does not produce a > workable config on a T1000. What really needs to be done is compare the files generated by 6.3 ldomctl and the 6.4 ldomctl (or 7.0 ldomctl) such

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2021-11-02 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Andrew Grillet > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:14:13 + > > These were attached to the email I sent last week - that is, the entire > contents of the directories in > which I defined the ldom.conf file and the results of compiling it. I have > attached the file again. > > In each case, thi

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2021-11-02 Thread Andrew Grillet
I will look at the pdf while I am away. I will not be able to test the diff til I get back next week. On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 14:46, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: Andrew Grillet > > Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 14:14:13 + > > > > These were attached to the email I sent last week - that is, the e

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2022-11-11 Thread Andrew Grillet
I was unable to compile and test the diff - compile times exceeded a week on a T1000, and then I took ill. I now confirm that this problems is present on 7.2 and appears to affect my T5120 as well. I can create configs with OBSD 6.3 which are bootable on T1000, T2000 and T5120. All later releases,

Re: Ldomctl generates defective config after OBSD 6.3 on T1000.

2022-11-12 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 06:46:31PM +, Andrew Grillet wrote: > I was unable to compile and test the diff - compile times exceeded a week > on a T1000, and > then I took ill. > > I now confirm that this problems is present on 7.2 and appears to affect my > T5120 as well. > I can create configs w