>Synopsis:
>Category: arm
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 5.9
Details : OpenBSD 5.9 (DBGGENERIC) #0: Sat Feb 6 12:22:27 EST 2016
r...@beagle2.mit.edu:/usr/src/sys/arch/armv7/compile/DBGGENERIC
Architecture: OpenBSD.armv7
Machine : armv7
>Description:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:43:28PM -0500, Anthony Eden wrote:
> >Synopsis:
> >Category: arm
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 5.9
> Details : OpenBSD 5.9 (DBGGENERIC) #0: Sat Feb 6 12:22:27 EST 2016
> r...@beagle2.mit.edu:/usr/src/sys/arch/armv7/compile/DBGGENERIC
Thanks for the quick response. Indeed, the patch makes the alignment
faults go away. But the 'device timeout' messages coming from cpsw(4)
remain.
To elaborate a bit, I set up three terminals pinging 192.168.123.201,
192.168.123.202, and 192.168.123.222 (the shared IP). After ~1min I
get no answer
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:45:50PM -0500, Anthony Eden wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response. Indeed, the patch makes the alignment
> faults go away. But the 'device timeout' messages coming from cpsw(4)
> remain.
>
> To elaborate a bit, I set up three terminals pinging 192.168.123.201,
> 192.168
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:02:06PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:43:28PM -0500, Anthony Eden wrote:
> > >Synopsis:
> >
> > To me that behavior might suggest the problem is deeper than a
> > bookkeeping mistake of aligning memory in mbuf.
>
> nope, you were righ
On 9 February 2016 at 11:31, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:02:06PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:43:28PM -0500, Anthony Eden wrote:
>> > >Synopsis:
>> >
>> > To me that behavior might suggest the problem is deeper than a
>> > bookkeeping mist
> On 9 Feb 2016, at 9:12 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>
> On 9 February 2016 at 11:31, David Gwynne wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:02:06PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:43:28PM -0500, Anthony Eden wrote:
> Synopsis:
To me that behavior might su
On 9 February 2016 at 12:19, David Gwynne wrote:
>
>> On 9 Feb 2016, at 9:12 PM, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
>>
>> On 9 February 2016 at 11:31, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:02:06PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 04:43:28PM -0500, Anthony Eden wrote:
>