Re: bad kernel id in bsd file

2016-10-16 Thread Martin Natano
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:13:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I'm OK with that. > > Thanks, I think I prefer the version with quotes, for consistency and > safety. Still ok? OK. > > Index: newvers.sh >

Re: bad kernel id in bsd file

2016-10-16 Thread Theo Buehler
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:13:09AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I'm OK with that. Thanks, I think I prefer the version with quotes, for consistency and safety. Still ok? Index: newvers.sh === RCS file:

Re: bad kernel id in bsd file

2016-10-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/10/16 12:02, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:54:44AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > Since the switch to the new way to build kernels, the identification > > string of kernels starts to be too "generic" (and unhelpfull for bug > > report). I noticed this today too :) >

Re: bad kernel id in bsd file

2016-10-16 Thread Theo Buehler
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:54:44AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > Hi, > > Since the switch to the new way to build kernels, the identification > string of kernels starts to be too "generic" (and unhelpfull for bug > report). > > $ ftp

bad kernel id in bsd file

2016-10-16 Thread Sebastien Marie
Hi, Since the switch to the new way to build kernels, the identification string of kernels starts to be too "generic" (and unhelpfull for bug report). $ ftp http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/bsd{,.mp,.rd} $ what bsd* bsd OpenBSD 6.0-current (obj) #0: Sat Oct 15