> Should the tib_tid also be initialized?
I don't think so, it is initialized outside of the TIB_INIT macro. See
e.g. setup_static_tib().
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 03:25:21PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> How about that diff.
Should the tib_tid also be initialized?
>
> Index: include/tib.h
> ===
> RCS file: /OpenBSD/src/include/tib.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.9
> diff -u
On Dec 8, 2023, at 10:25 AM, Miod Vallat wrote:
>
> How about that diff.
>
Tested on amd64 and it does indeed fix the problem. This is clearly
the cause. okay kurt@
> Index: include/tib.h
> ===
> RCS file:
How about that diff.
Index: include/tib.h
===
RCS file: /OpenBSD/src/include/tib.h,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.9 tib.h
--- include/tib.h 27 Dec 2022 07:44:56 - 1.9
+++ include/tib.h 8 Dec 2023
While hunting for why the jdk's stack overflow execptions were randomly
not working, I determined the root cause was that pthread_main_np(3)
randomly fails to work properly. Reproduced on sparc64, amd64, and
aarch64. On i386 the standalone test program doesn't reproduce the
problem. However, I
