On 12 September 2016 at 20:25, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 13:43 +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
>> > On 09/02/16 10:24, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>> > > I see a performance drop to 10 Mbit/sec on some old i386 mach
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 13:43 +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> > On 09/02/16 10:24, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > I see a performance drop to 10 Mbit/sec on some old i386 machines
> > > with em(4). Can you try this kernel diff to see
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> On 09/02/16 10:24, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > I see a performance drop to 10 Mbit/sec on some old i386 machines
> > with em(4). Can you try this kernel diff to see wether it is the
> > same problem?
> >
>
> yes, >50 MB/s now. Tha
On 09/02/16 10:24, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:43:13AM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
I'm observing very slow ssh / sshd performance on current (tested on amd64).
Throughput is less than 1/50th of what I'm typically seeing on my boxes.
This drop in performance s
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:43:13AM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> I'm observing very slow ssh / sshd performance on current (tested on amd64).
> Throughput is less than 1/50th of what I'm typically seeing on my boxes.
> This drop in performance seems to be independent of the u
I'm observing very slow ssh / sshd performance on current (tested on
amd64). Throughput is less than 1/50th of what I'm typically seeing on
my boxes. This drop in performance seems to be independent of the used
ciphers (tested with aes-gcm-128 & chacha20-poly1305).
All tested