> I have to wonder if the "old bug" complaints are coming in reference to
> one of the following:
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3064/info
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5531/info
My dejavu was of
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1994-09.html
It wasn't hard to find in old email, googl
Le samedi 17 février 2007 à 22:43 +0100, Marcello Barnaba a écrit :
> And how do you unlock yourself free, afterwards?
Hard reset, if available :(
--
http://sid.rstack.org/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
>> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200702-06
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - - -
I have to wonder if the "old bug" complaints are coming in reference to
one of the following:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3064/info
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5531/info
I know that my initial reaction was "haven't I seen this before?" but
the above two are what I found in my notes when
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200702-07
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://security.gentoo.org/
- - - - - -
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tested it in IE7 and has the same problem. Opera 9.10 blocks the
> opening of the new window but fails in the second button.
With MSIE7, it is possible only if you check 'Allow websites to open
windows without address or status bar' for that partic
I tested it in IE7 and has the same problem. Opera 9.10 blocks the opening of
the new window but fails in the second button.
On 16 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I believe in the early 90's there was a serious problem discovered in intel
> chips that allowed certain standard code to be run to overflow programs
> arbitrarily and gain access to operating systems in an administrative
> capacity.
>
> Also I remember
A very simple solution (for home users at least, although could be implemented
to commercial/enterprise as well) to this dilemma would be to block
access/pop-up warning message for all traffic from the Internal LAN IPs to
Internal LAN based webpages (port 80,81,8080 and 443)... i.e. MOST modems
#
#
#DotClear v1.2.5 < = RFi Vulnerabilities ( KaRTaL )
#
#Download : http://www.spacemarc.it/scriptphp/index.php?script=meganoidesnews111
#
#Script Name : DotClear v1.2.5
#
#
###
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
In some mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED], sie said:
1) This seems like a case of "old code" somehow creeping back in to the
current versions, and that's a phenomenon I've seen happen at a couple of
different places that I've worked at over the years. It's kin
In some mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED], sie said:
>
> 1) This seems like a case of "old code" somehow creeping back in to the
> current versions, and that's a phenomenon I've seen happen at a couple of
> different places that I've worked at over the years. It's kind of a
> special case of version
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, jf wrote:
There have also been too many times in the past when they have been proven
correct to ignore the possibility any longer.
Hi, in what instances has the conjecture that a bug was a deliberate
backdoor been proven correct?
If Peter is crying WOLF all the time. Th
I believe in the early 90's there was a serious problem discovered in intel
chips that allowed certain standard code to be run to overflow programs
arbitrarily and gain access to operating systems in an administrative capacity.
Also I remember the redhat (back in the day) repository being hacked
##
#Plume CMS 1.2.2 < = RFi Vulnerabilities
#
#Download : http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/pxsystem/plume-1.2.2.zip?download
#
#Script Name : Plume CMS 1.2.2
#
#
##
#
#C
I have produced a temporary fix for this security vulnerability. The fix can be
found at:
http://discussion.treocentral.com/showthread.php?p=1199445&posted=1#post1199445
I will be providing an alternate URL in the following week.
Firefox suffers from a design flaw that can be used to confuse casual
users and evoke a false sense of authority when visiting a fraudulent
website. The flaw can be also used to bypass a fix for an old UI spoofing
bug that was thought to be addressed. This is a relatively minor issue,
but I thought
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:26:43 GMT
From: Fergie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: funsec@linuxbox.org
Subject: [funsec] Quebec Health Officials Fighting Computer Virus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Via The Montreal Gazette (props, Flying Hamster).
18 matches
Mail list logo
