Haven't seen this mentioned, so for what it's worth :
"phpBB 2.0.5 released"
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=56
(Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 4:12 am)
Quote:
What has changed in this release?
This edition includes a significant number of fixes for bugs
and a minor
In case you don't already have this waiting to go to the list, HPUX 11.x
file contents disclosure bug in "Software Distributor".
Nick Boyce
EDS, Bristol, UK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 May 2002 13:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HP-UX
Microsoft's Security Bulletin MS01-033 (the one announcing the vulnerability
being used by Code Red, and the patch availability) states :
"The Windows NT 4.0 patch can be installed on systems
Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 6a."
(See
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/
Can Tridge or anyone else confirm whether or not this bug was present in
Samba versions earlier than 2.0.7 ?
Along with 2.0.7, we still run 2.0.5a, which is the latest "security fix"
version available as a binary for some of our Unixen, and we have an
exceptionally old-fashioned Un*x still runnin
Usual question - anyone know how bad this one is ? The words "buffer
overflow" scare me :-)
===< cut >===
[...]
Digest Name: daily security bulletins digest
Created: Mon Mar 19 3:00:03 PST 2001
Document ID Title
--- ---
HPSBUX0103
On 18th.Jan.2001, Ben Greenbaum forwarded this HP security alert :
[edited]
===< cut >==
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:02:29 -0800 (PST)
From: IT Resource Center <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Document ID: HPSB
Summary: "The Matrix" Windows 9.x/NT screensaver password protection
doesn't work.
This is *not* a major problem, especially for those folks who stick
to guidelines and never install any screensavers that weren't supplied
by Microsoft with Windows ;-). In fact it hardly seems worth bothering
Bu
