==
@mail($us1, $us2, "http://".$us2.$_SERVER['SCRIPT_NAME']."\n".$us3);
php config on production servers should have the following directives set to
display_errors = off
log_errors = on
error_log = /your/full/path/html/error.log
#include
int main()
{
/* win32_exec - EXITFUNC=process CMD=calc.exe Size=138 Encoder=None
http://metasploit.com */
unsigned char scode[] =
"\xfc\xe8\x44\x00\x00\x00\x8b\x45\x3c\x8b\x7c\x05\x78\x01\xef\x8b"
"\x4f\x18\x8b\x5f\x20\x01\xeb\x49\x8b\x34\x8b\x01\xee\x31\xc0\x99"
"\xac\x84\xc0\x74\x07\
This is a bogus vulnerability.
Ability to dump the process memory for a random system account implies that the
system is fully compromised.
Besides Hamachi 1.x does not use password-based login authentication as it's
clearly stated in a product description.
MS08-014
I got the sample two weeks ago and I modified it into the useful exploit.
Tested on:
Microsoft Windows XP SP2 && Microsoft Offset 2003 < SP3 or No
MS08-014 Patch
http://www.chroot.org/exploits/zha0_ms08_014.rar
Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If nruns would be courageous enough, they would release this proof of concept
tool to create prejustice and have the law checked.
To my feeling, the German security scene suffers from paranoia rather than
trying to find out how the law is enforced.
nruns legal department should be able to cope
My school just rolled out Blackboard Vista 4, and boy is it vulnerable :D
Another unpatch flaw in Antiphishing Firefox 2.0.0.1, 2.0.0.2, 2.0.0.3 is this:
http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/its-a-trap.html DETECTED
Now, add some characters "/":
http://www.mozilla.com/firefoxits-a-trap.html ANTIPHISHING BYPASSED
Security Advisory
Xbox 360 Hypervisor Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
Release Date:
February 28, 2007
Author:
Anonymous Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Timeline:
Oct 31, 2006 - release of 4532 kernel, which is the first version
containing the bug
Nov 16, 2006 - pr
Couldn't you just target pretty much any dynamic page on the web with such a
script? All you'd have to do is edit a few details.
I don't understand how this qualifies as a security hole?
> -Original Message-
> From: David Litchfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Preventing exploitation with rebasing
>
> So how easy is it to rebase DLLs and executables? Ver
There a few other ways to get to a hack of this sort. These also assume a
compromised DC in one domain of a multidomain Forest.
In the organization I work for we have not discovered a satisfactory resolution to
these exposures. We may be heading towards the implementation of multiple forests
It's been alleged that this source code, once compiled, was used by
persons unknown in the distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks
earlier this year. Obviously such a thing cannot be confirmed aside from
through a process of targeted sites making an appropriate comparison
between the traffic
Mike Frantzen wrote:
> customized kernel that would fetch a kernel module off the net at boot
Hmmm. Whose net? The real one or my spoof?
If you can't trust the guy who has the hardware in his hands, you have a very
difficult job I suspect.
dler
*
* handle signals
*
* no return value
*/
void
sighandler (const int signal)
{
printf ("received signal: %d... exiting!\n", signal);
cleanup_and_exit ();
}
/* err
*
* print an error message. if arg0 is set add an errno message (perror like)
*
/*
* ADM CONFIDENTIAL -- (ADM Confidential Restricted when
* combined with the aggregated modules for this product)
* OBJECT CODE ONLY SOURCE MATERIALS
* (C) COPYRIGHT ADM Crew. 1999
* All Rights Reserved
*
* This module may not be used, published, distributed or archived without
* the wri
Ooh, those pesky NXT records. Like I process those every day.
Fascinating read in RFC 2535, but suppose I don't have any NXT
records in my own zones, under what circumstances will my DNS server
commit the sin of "the processing of NXT records"? In other words,
are all of us vulnerable (even cach
code, for full-disclosure
purposes (hi aleph1!).
See you later,
your local anonymous ADM representative.
I have another take on this thread that might also be of interest to those
that have been following it since last week. First, kudos to Lance for
the excellent documentation of the denial of service condition bought
about by the mishandling of ACK packets by FW-1. But:
1) We also now have proof
Hi folks,
THC released a new article dealing with FreeBSD 3.x
Kernel modules that can attack/backdoor the
system.
You can find our article on http://thc.pimmel.com or
http://r3wt.base.org.
Greets, pragmatic / The Hacker's Choice
21 matches
Mail list logo
