On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 00:49 +0100, Robert Święcki wrote:
> Michal Zalewski wrote:
>
> > Note: this is a 30-minute hack that involves C code coupled with a cheesy
> > shellscript. It may not work on non-Linux systems, and may fail on some
> > Linuxes, too. It could be improved in a number of ways -
Michal Zalewski wrote:
> Note: this is a 30-minute hack that involves C code coupled with a cheesy
> shellscript. It may not work on non-Linux systems, and may fail on some
> Linuxes, too. It could be improved in a number of ways - so if you like
> it, rewrite it.
Slightly rewritten version in C,
LFT is similar to tcptraceroute in that it uses TCP SYN probes. As
Michal stated in his original message, 0trace is different as it
piggybacks on an already established TCP connection.
Regards,
Jon Oberheide
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 09:03 +0100, Alessandro Dellavedova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> am I wrong
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Alessandro Dellavedova wrote:
> am I wrong or the mechanism that you implement is similar to the one
> implemented in lft (Layer Four Traceroute http://pwhois.org/lft/ ) ?
No, what you describe is similar to tcptraceroute, from what I understand
(they use stray SYNs or RSTs or
Hi,
am I wrong or the mechanism that you implement is similar to the one
implemented in lft (Layer Four Traceroute http://pwhois.org/lft/ ) ?
From the homepage:
"LFT is the all-in-one traceroute tool because it can launch a
variety of different probes using both UDP and TCP layer-4 protoco
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Michal Zalewski wrote:
> [ Of course, I might be wrong, but Google seems to agree with my
> assessment. A related use of this idea is 'firewalk' by Schiffman and
> Goldsmith, a tool to probe firewall ACLs; another utility called
> 'tcptraceroute' by Michael C. Toren imple
