RE: Check Point response to RDP Bypass

2001-07-15 Thread Clarke, Paul [IT]
is included no matter what your implied policy rules are. Laters, Paul -Original Message- From: Jochen Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Check Point response to RDP Bypass On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:41:23AM +020

Re: Check Point response to RDP Bypass

2001-07-12 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Johan Lindqvist wrote: > The original advisory > (http://www.inside-security.de/advisories/fw1_rdp.html) says that a > workaround is to "Deactivate implied rules in the Check Point policy editor > (and build your own rules for management connections).". I've not been able > t

Re: Check Point response to RDP Bypass

2001-07-11 Thread Jochen Bauer
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:41:23AM +0200, Johan Lindqvist wrote: > The original advisory > (http://www.inside-security.de/advisories/fw1_rdp.html) says that a > workaround is to "Deactivate implied rules in the Check Point policy editor > (and build your own rules for management connections).".

Re: Check Point response to RDP Bypass

2001-07-11 Thread Johan Lindqvist
The original advisory (http://www.inside-security.de/advisories/fw1_rdp.html) says that a workaround is to "Deactivate implied rules in the Check Point policy editor (and build your own rules for management connections).". I've not been able to find any changes in the INSPECT code generated to

Check Point response to RDP Bypass

2001-07-09 Thread aleph1
- Forwarded message from Scott Walker Register <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Scott Walker Register <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Check Point response to RDP Bypass Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:33:42 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Z-