Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows

2001-07-15 Thread Dmitry Guyvoronsky
Hello Georgi, Tuesday, July 10, 2001, 5:17:31 PM, you wrote: GG> Georgi Guninski security advisory #48, 2001 GG> FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows GG> Systems affected: GG> FreeBSD 4.3 and probably earlier versions. Successfully works also at

Re: Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much betterthan Windows

2001-07-15 Thread Lucian Hudin
> >> FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows > > PF> This problem was already reported to FreeBSD Security Officer about two > PF> months ago, but it was totally ignored. > > This problem has fixed and the exploit didn't work for las

Re: Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows

2001-07-15 Thread Eirik Hjelle
> >> FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows > > PF> This problem was already reported to FreeBSD Security Officer about two > PF> months ago, but it was totally ignored. > > This problem has fixed and the exploit didn't work for las

Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root

2001-07-15 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
> > http://www.frasunek.com/sources/security/rexec/ > This workaround not complete, because it doesn't protect for the bug > exploitation. For example the attacker can send the shellcode via stdin > to the suid program. It's address can also be determined with removing > the suid bit from the prog

Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better thanWindows

2001-07-15 Thread Kanedaaa
FreeBSD xxx.org 5.0-20010415-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-20010415-CURRENT #0: Sun Apr 15 15:53:33 GMT 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC i386 Thiz version is affected too... ***$$$### " I moze bardzo wielu nie zrozumie tych slow... Ale nie ma litosci dla SKURWYSY

Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root

2001-07-15 Thread Foldi Tamas
> Quick workaround is to limit arguments, environment and filter non-ascii > characters: > > http://www.frasunek.com/sources/security/rexec/ This workaround not complete, because it doesn't protect for the bug exploitation. For example the attacker can send the shellcode via stdin to the suid p

Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root

2001-07-15 Thread Matias Sedalo
one@c0d4:/usr/home/c0d4$ uname FreeBSD one.xxx.com.ar 4.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE one@c0d4:/usr/home/c0d4$ ./sig2 vvfreebsd. Written by Georgi Guninski shall jump to bfbffe89 child=1371 login: # done # id uid=1000(c0d4) euid=0(root) gid=20(staff) groups=20(staff) # and with : /usr/bin/chfn

Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows

2001-07-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:12:30PM +0200, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: > > FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows > > This problem was already reported to FreeBSD Security Officer about two > months ago, but it was totally ignored. Sorry about that: c

Re: Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows

2001-07-11 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
> This problem has fixed and the exploit didn't work for last > 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD. Exploit *works* even for 4.3-STABLE, before correction date (2 Jul 2001): riget:venglin:~> ./v vvfreebsd. Written by Georgi Guninski shall jump to bfbffe72 child=57660 Password:done # id uid=0(root) gid=1001(use

Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root

2001-07-11 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
> Well, after a bunch of tests I've found only two suids which gave me > suid shell: > /usr/bin/passwd > /usr/local/bin/ssh1 /usr/bin/su also works for me: riget:venglin:~> egrep -e execl vvfreebsd.c if(!execl("/usr/bin/su","su","szymon",0)) riget:venglin:~> ./v vvfreebsd. Written by Georgi G

Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows

2001-07-11 Thread Georgi Guninski
Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: > > > FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows > > This problem was already reported to FreeBSD Security Officer about two > months ago, but it was totally ignored. > If this is the case I don't understand why you

Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows

2001-07-11 Thread Alexandr Dubovikov
Çäðàâñòâóéòå, Przemyslaw. Âû ïèñàëè âòîðíèê, 10 èþëÿ 2001 ã., 21:12:30: >> FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows PF> This problem was already reported to FreeBSD Security Officer about two PF> months ago, but it was totally ignored. This problem has f

Re: FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows

2001-07-10 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
> FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows This problem was already reported to FreeBSD Security Officer about two months ago, but it was totally ignored. -- * Fido: 2:480/124 ** WWW: http://www.frasunek.com/ ** NIC-HDL: PMF9-RIPE * * Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] **

FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows

2001-07-10 Thread Georgi Guninski
Georgi Guninski security advisory #48, 2001 FreeBSD 4.3 local root, yet Linux and *BSD much better than Windows Systems affected: FreeBSD 4.3 and probably earlier versions. Risk: High Date: 10 July 2001 Legal Notice: This Advisory is Copyright (c) 2001 Georgi Guninski. You may distribute it