On Sat, 27 May 2006, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers wrote:
> On 2006-05-25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Although it is a well known fact that Windows desktops and servers
> > still use LM Hashes and cache the last ten userids and passwords
> > locally, just in-case an Active Directory, Domain, or NDS
ww.amazon.com/gp/product/0764599909
*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:47 AM
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: LM hashes in a hot-desking environment
Although it is a well known fact that Window
On 2006-05-25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Although it is a well known fact that Windows desktops and servers
> still use LM Hashes and cache the last ten userids and passwords
> locally, just in-case an Active Directory, Domain, or NDS tree are not
> available, has anyone thought about the consequen
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
--Thursday, May 25, 2006, 5:46:43 PM, you wrote to bugtraq@securityfocus.com:
fzo> Although it is a well known fact that Windows desktops and servers still
fzo> use LM Hashes and cache the last ten userids and passwords locally, just
fzo> in-case an Active Directory, Domai
Although it is a well known fact that Windows desktops and servers still
use LM Hashes and cache the last ten userids and passwords locally, just
in-case an Active Directory, Domain, or NDS tree are not available, has
anyone thought about the consequences of this issue in a hot-desking, or
flexible
