On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, John Horn wrote:
>
> Hmmm, interesting. Nevertheless, such activity contravenes various federal
> statutes and/or possibly state statutes at either the point of origination
> and/or the destination (or both). I would suggest that anyone interested
> in accepting this offer con
Since nobody has pointed it out yet it has been said by various people, at
least one of them in print, (including Spafford, I think) that these
challenges are unlikely to attract the real experts, who can charge large
consulting fees. It simply makes no sense for these people to give their
service
Aleph1, I don't know if this posting is really pertinent to the list but
considering the potential for serious penalties, I thought it might be
advisable to point this out.
Hmmm, interesting. Nevertheless, such activity contravenes various federal
statutes and/or possibly state statutes at either
[ executive summary: Microsoft are asking you to crack their
machine running on win2k and iis. ]
The LinuxPPC folks have set up a similar site as a response.
It's located at http://crack.linuxppc.org/ . Similar rules,
ie DoS attacks are discouraged (and uninteresting), and they
want a better
[ executive summary: Microsoft are asking you to crack their
machine running on win2k and iis. ]
I haven't seen anything about this on bugtraq before, and I'm not
entirely sure if it's appropriate, but this is from
http://www.windows2000test.com/ground_rules.htm:
Microsoft