Gadi,
[...]
One note: although it could just as well be a bug, who says it was not a
backdoor in the early 90's?
Also, I understand this does not work on older Solaris/SunOS systems
(anyone can verify?)
I can. It is not present in anything before Solaris 10.
which adds to my personal
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Joep Vesseur wrote:
Gadi,
[...]
One note: although it could just as well be a bug, who says it was not a
backdoor in the early 90's?
Also, I understand this does not work on older Solaris/SunOS systems
(anyone can verify?)
I can. It is not present in
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Michael Wojcik wrote:
From: Thierry Zoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 12 February, 2007 07:52
GE telnet -l -froot [hostname]
Should we really consider this a BUG ? With all due respect, this
reads, smells and probably tastes like a backdoor
From: Thierry Zoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 12 February, 2007 07:52
GE telnet -l -froot [hostname]
Should we really consider this a BUG ? With all due respect, this
reads, smells and probably tastes like a backdoor
It's a bug. I recall it being found and fixed in
It's a bug. I recall it being found and fixed in AIX many years ago.
Embarassing for Sun that it's still in Solaris, though.
It's not still in Solaris; it's the first time it occurred in
Solaris; it is stupid it did but it's a typical programming error:
passing unchecked arguments to a program
Dear List,
GE telnet -l -froot [hostname]
GE but this bug isnt -froot, its -fanythingbutroot =P
Should we really consider this a BUG ? With all due respect, this
reads, smells and probably tastes like a backdoor, and obvious one
granted but still, to my believe this raises the question are
