On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
ISA Server is an application that is installed on top of the base OS. Are
you suggesting that the application should actually prevent the local
administrator of the host machine from installing and configuring what
protocols are bound to what adap
ISA Server is an application that is installed on top of the base OS. Are
you suggesting that the application should actually prevent the local
administrator of the host machine from installing and configuring what
protocols are bound to what adapters?
To me, *that* is the borderline. There is no
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, 3APA3A wrote:
--Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 2:12:10 PM, you wrote to bugtraq@securityfocus.com:
CK>is open for any attacks as long as they are IPv6 based. If that
CK>is right, this is an extremly nasty bug. If ISA Server 2004 and
CK>Windows 2003 Basic Firew
Dear Christine Kronberg,
--Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 2:12:10 PM, you wrote to bugtraq@securityfocus.com:
CK>is open for any attacks as long as they are IPv6 based. If that
CK>is right, this is an extremly nasty bug. If ISA Server 2004 and
CK>Windows 2003 Basic Firewall cannot
