Kelly O'Hair kirjoitti: > Good catch on the ccache issue. > > But if you set the build number, the full version information will not tell > you when the private openjdk was built (via java -version). > Sometimes that is really handy to know. > > I assume the issue is the macro FULL_VERSION being defined on all the > compile > lines, right? I think I would rather just fix the makefiles. > Maybe only define FULL_VERSION on the compiles of the files that need it? > It might only be one or two files that need this macro defined. >
Yes. All the files which have FULL_VERSION defined don't make use of ccache. Could you do unified diffs (diff -u) in the future please. I did take a look at where FULL_VERSION is used in files and it was only a couple so your approach should work quite well too. For now I switched to the following output for Gentoo: openjdk version "1.7.0-experimental" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-experimental-gentoo-b13) OpenJDK Tiered VM (build 1.7.0-experimental-gentoo-b13, mixed mode) I think experimental is more fitting than internal. Maybe we should add some info about the ebuild revision to the end too. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
