jdk7/jsn/corba: 3 new changesets

2007-12-03 Thread weijun . wang
Changeset: a8072479696b Author:weijun Date: 2007-11-29 09:55 +0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jsn/corba/rev/a8072479696b More REAME ! README Changeset: 49538017ddfd Author:billgates Date: 2007-12-02 13:53 +0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jsn/corb

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Xiomara Jayasena
Yes, since no code had changed as suspected the build passed. -Xiomara Phil Race wrote: Roman, > error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory The requirement for this header file isn't new, and its used in the production bits too, and since the openjdk code is the same as b23 so if you d

Re: kdiff3 arguments order

2007-12-03 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Looking at hgmerge it's obvious nobody agreed on any common option parsing rules for merge tools. :^( Watch out for your PATH setting. The hgmerge script behave according to whether it can find the various tools in your PATH, and it looks for many different names for the same tool. On Solaris...

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Roman Kennke
Hi Phil, > Roman, > > error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory > > The requirement for this header file isn't new, and its used in the > production bits too, and since the openjdk code is the same as b23 > so if you don't have this file I'd have expected previous builds/drops > to fail

Re: kdiff3 arguments order

2007-12-03 Thread Brad Wetmore
Yuri Nesterenko wrote: Colleagues, moderately useful dry-run finding: using kdiff3 as a merge tool for mercurial, you better wrap it in the script like this ("merge = ~/bin/kdiff3.sh" in my .hgrc): #!/bin/bash /opt/kde3/bin/kdiff3 -o $1 $2 $1 $3 I like kdiff3 too, but doesn't work under de

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Phil Race
Roman, > error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory The requirement for this header file isn't new, and its used in the production bits too, and since the openjdk code is the same as b23 so if you don't have this file I'd have expected previous builds/drops to fail for you also. -phil. R

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Xiomara Jayasena
Hi Roman, The build I was referring to was for the product build. I am working on building the openjdk build and will let you know. -Xiomara Roman Kennke wrote: Hello everybody, with a fresh checkout from the new repositories I get the following compile error, am I missing something here?:

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Roman Kennke
Hello everybody, with a fresh checkout from the new repositories I get the following compile error, am I missing something here?: /usr/bin/gcc -O3-fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -W -Wall -Wno-unused -Wno-parentheses -fno-omit-frame-pointer -D_LITTLE_ENDIAN -D__MEDIALIB_OLD_NAMES -D__USE_J2D_NAM

Re: ccplus: warnings being trated as errors

2007-12-03 Thread Roger Abelenda
I used the const_string patch and it seems to work fine, thanks. I didn't try with the second option (change the settings of the compiler). 2007/12/2, mvfranz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > > > Yes, had the same issue on Debian. Arnaud van Dyck made a page > > describing

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Xiomara Jayasena
Mark Reinhold wrote: Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:11:46 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * We are finishing up our Mercurial dryrun this week. In the next few days, all the repositories at http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ will be re-initialized, making them unrelated to the previous

jdk7/jsn/jdk: edit comment

2007-12-03 Thread michael . mcmahon
Changeset: f023956584fb Author:michaelm Date: 2007-12-03 13:51 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jsn/jdk/rev/f023956584fb edit comment ! test/sun/net/www/httptest/HttpServer.java

Re: Build 24 promotion and the Mercurial Transition Status

2007-12-03 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 30/11/2007, Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Build 24 and the Mercurial Transition Status: > >* We are finishing up our Mercurial dryrun this week. > In the next few days, all the repositories at > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ > will be re-initialized, making them unrel