Hi Jon,
> I find the ":" in "(sun/font:FontManager$4$1.class)" somewhat
> strange. It might be worth checking CreateSymbols to see if that is
> just an artifact of the error message, or if it is indicative of the
> error.
Hmm, I'm not sure where this string is created.
> Have you tried us
I like it. Much more than forests which always seemed clunky to me.
I particularly like the fact that all modules would be listed in a file
at the top level. Would make the writing of tools and scripts a lot
easier and snappier.
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
FYI...
Interesting ideas on the use of for
Roman,
I find the ":" in "(sun/font:FontManager$4$1.class)" somewhat
strange. It might be worth checking CreateSymbols to see if that is
just an artifact of the error message, or if it is indicative of the
error.
Have you tried using javap or similar disassembler to see if they can
rea
Yes. You need an older make.exe.
See: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2007-July/000116.html
(Download a patched cygwin make binary from
http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe )
Good catch, thanks.
-kto
Francis ANDRE wrote:
free.exe belongs to the package procps
>> make
Hi Roman,
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:36 +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
> while developing on my Innovators Challenge project, I came about the
> following build error:
>
> http://kennke.org/~roman/build-error.txt
It is easier if you at least include the error/warnings in the email:
error: bad
Uhmm, could you please re-formulate why do you think this is a javac
problem? I can't see any compilation errors on the log file
Moreover the following code compiles with the latest snapshot of javac
class Test {
final Runnable fileCloserRunnable = new Runnable() {
public void run() {
Hi there,
while developing on my Innovators Challenge project, I came about the
following build error:
http://kennke.org/~roman/build-error.txt
I'm not sure what com.sun.tools.javac.sym.CreateSymbols does and why it
fails. The classes all compile fine. A couple of notes:
- This error only occur
>> make/sanity-rules.gmk:61: *** multiple target patterns. Stop.
Or instead of downgrading to make 3.80, you can use this patched make 3.81 that
works with DOS name.
http://www.cmake.org/files/cygwin/make.exe
Kelly O'Hair a écrit :
Yes. It is looking for the free command.
It uses free to f
