On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote:
I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is
any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if
someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely easy.
There's just so much stuff dependent
Anthony Petrov wrote:
On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote:
I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is
any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if
someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely
easy. There's just so
Andrew raises a good point.
It's true that Sun does not provide binaries for OpenJDK,
and the code that deploys them is not open source,
but... it would be nice if Sun did provide OpenJDK binaries
(since Sun builds them)
and I would certainly expect the web deployment code
to become open source
Martin Buchholz wrote:
Andrew raises a good point.
It's true that Sun does not provide binaries for OpenJDK,
and the code that deploys them is not open source,
but... it would be nice if Sun did provide OpenJDK binaries
(since Sun builds them)
OpenJDK is an open source delivery, the JDK7
Phil's understanding is also mine.
I don't doubt that at some time in the future these two products might
be different builds, due to patches and so forth, but as I read all the
web pages, they should be in fact the same actual compiler and optimizer.
It's some of the fluff around the edges that
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Phil's understanding is also mine.
I don't doubt that at some time in the future these two products might
be different builds, due to patches and so forth, but as I read all the
web pages, they should be in fact the same actual compiler and optimizer.
It's some of the fluff
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Kelly O'Hair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I were still at Sun, I probably would have used
Sun's internal bug-tracking system to report such bugs.
The bug with the execute permissions is filed, are you refering
to another bug?
No. Probably the ease of
Hi All
I cannot build JDK on Linux (Ubuntu 8.10) now. gnumake fails inside
jdk/make/java/management, complaining
ProxyInputStream.java:39: package org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable does not
exist
import org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable.InputStream;
^
What's happening
Strange, if I go into corba/make and call gnumake, the generated
classes.jar includes those files. However, they are not there if I
build the whole openjdk.
Max
On Jul 31, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
Hi All
I cannot build JDK on Linux (Ubuntu 8.10) now. gnumake fails
