build 42 has come, and the JDK binaries no longer work on my
system (32-bit Ubuntu dapper). java -version gives
an instant crash with floating point exception.
Not very friendly.
I have always liked the fact that in the past Sun's JDK engineers
put in great effort to ensure that JDK binaries
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 00:52 -0800, Martin Buchholz wrote:
build 42 has come, and the JDK binaries no longer work on my
system (32-bit Ubuntu dapper). java -version gives
an instant crash with floating point exception.
Not very friendly.
I have always liked the fact that in the
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:25 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 16:42 +0200, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi guys,
I could take care of applying the same patch than what I did
a few months ago for OpenJDK 6.
Namely, if you compile OpenJDK with the binary plugs, the SNMP
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 09:32 -0800, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:57, Mark Wielaard m...@klomp.org wrote:
Are there any official GPL binaries for OpenJDK these days?
No, but I encourage Sun and encourage others to encourage Sun
to provide those, at least for
These are not official product binaries but early access binary
snapshots, you can't expect these binaries to be perfect by any
means. They are also not OpenJDK7 builds but JDK7 builds.
It was decided that we needed to update our JDK7 Linux build
systems, so we had to do something to move out of
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:27, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
As an example of the cost of building on old boxes, OpenJDK contains
prototypes for epoll(7) that are incorrect for some arches. These
We are changing the subject slightly from portability of binaries
Hi Martin,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 10:37 -0800, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:53, Mark Wielaard m...@klomp.org wrote:
Still, if they were around I would indeed take a look and compare stuff
a bit with my local builds if I had any strange test failures for
example.
