Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On May 15, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello.
Erik Trimble wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/5/15 Erik Trimble :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Hi all (especially Joe),
Now that the HotSpot Express repositories are available, what is the
plan for incl
An mq patch changeset has a "virtual" tag (in self.repo.tags()) which
is not recorded in the .hgtags file.
I think even for an mq patch, jcheck can still check about TAB, CR and
end white spaces.
Max
On May 16, 2009, at 9:50 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Is it not possible to detect that mq
On May 15, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello.
Erik Trimble wrote:
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/5/15 Erik Trimble :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Hi all (especially Joe),
Now that the HotSpot Express repositories are available, what is
the
plan for including hs14 in OpenJDK6
Is it not possible to detect that mq is in use/"active" and just bail on
jcheck altogether? i.e. jcheck should surely not apply if you're just
commiting a patch into your local set of mq patches.
-- Jon
On May 15, 2009, at 10:36 PM, Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
I've patched my local jcheck a litt
Now the b59 bits are available, but there is a new problem:
$ java -jar jdk-7-ea-plug-b59-linux-x64-14_may_2009.jar
Invalid or corrupt jarfile jdk-7-ea-plug-b59-linux-x64-14_may_2009.jar
Martin
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 19:59, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 17:13, Vassili Igouc
