Re: [Fwd: Boot cycle builds]

2009-10-26 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/10/26 Jonathan Gibbons : Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes : 2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair : FYI... Original Message Subject: Boot cycle builds Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22 -0700 From: Kelly O'Hair To: jdk7...@openjdk.

Re: [Fwd: Boot cycle builds]

2009-10-26 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/10/26 Jonathan Gibbons : > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > 2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes : > > > 2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair : > > > FYI... > > Original Message > Subject: Boot cycle builds > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22 -0700 > From: Kelly O'Hair > To: jdk7...@openjdk.java.net

Re: Fix for 6888888 breaks the build

2009-10-26 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/10/26 Jonathan Gibbons : Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes : 2009/10/16 Kelly O'Hair : Tim Bell wrote: Andrew John Hughes wrote: (snip!) I think there's still an issue here that makes this patch worth pushing. The 688 fix d

Re: [Fwd: Boot cycle builds]

2009-10-26 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes : 2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair : FYI... Original Message Subject: Boot cycle builds Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22 -0700 From: Kelly O'Hair To: jdk7...@openjdk.java.net Heads up... As soon as we can do a jdk7 boo

hg: jdk7/build/jdk: 6895287: disable building fontchecker

2009-10-26 Thread ahughes
Changeset: 9bc5338675e0 Author:andrew Date: 2009-10-26 21:42 + URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/9bc5338675e0 6895287: disable building fontchecker Summary: Changes to FontManager break bootstrap due to the fontchecker tool Reviewed-by: prr ! make/tools/Makefil

Re: Fix for 6888888 breaks the build

2009-10-26 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/10/26 Jonathan Gibbons : > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > 2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes : > > > 2009/10/16 Kelly O'Hair : > > > Tim Bell wrote: > > > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > > (snip!) > > > I think there's still an issue here that makes this patch worth > pushing.   The 688 fix didn't

Re: [Fwd: Boot cycle builds]

2009-10-26 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes : > 2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair : >> >> FYI... >> >> Original Message >> Subject: Boot cycle builds >> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22 -0700 >> From: Kelly O'Hair >> To: jdk7...@openjdk.java.net >> >> >> Heads up... >> >> As soon as we can do a jdk7 boot

Re: Fix for 6888888 breaks the build

2009-10-26 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes : 2009/10/16 Kelly O'Hair : Tim Bell wrote: Andrew John Hughes wrote: (snip!) I think there's still an issue here that makes this patch worth pushing. The 688 fix didn't cause the bug, but merely

Re: Fix for 6888888 breaks the build

2009-10-26 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/10/26 Andrew John Hughes : > 2009/10/16 Kelly O'Hair : >> >> Tim Bell wrote: Andrew John Hughes wrote: >>> >>> (snip!) > > I think there's still an issue here that makes this patch worth > pushing.   The 688 fix didn't cause the bug, but merely made it > visible t

Re: Fix for 6888888 breaks the build

2009-10-26 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/10/16 Kelly O'Hair : > > Tim Bell wrote: >>> >>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> >> (snip!) I think there's still an issue here that makes this patch worth pushing.   The 688 fix didn't cause the bug, but merely made it visible to a lot more people.  So 6889255 will only h

Re: [Fwd: Boot cycle builds]

2009-10-26 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/10/26 Kelly O'Hair : > > FYI... > > Original Message > Subject: Boot cycle builds > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22 -0700 > From: Kelly O'Hair > To: jdk7...@openjdk.java.net > > > Heads up... > > As soon as we can do a jdk7 boot cycle build again, I plan on changing > the de

[Fwd: Boot cycle builds]

2009-10-26 Thread Kelly O'Hair
FYI... Original Message Subject: Boot cycle builds Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:22 -0700 From: Kelly O'Hair To: jdk7...@openjdk.java.net Heads up... As soon as we can do a jdk7 boot cycle build again, I plan on changing the default build to include a boot cycle build (where